I Permutations written as product of 2-cycles

Kaguro
Messages
221
Reaction score
57
TL;DR Summary
The decomposition of an n-cycle into 2-cycles can be done in various ways. I don't understand how to think of other ways.
I'm trying to learn Group Theory from Gallian's book. When I reached the chapter for permutation groups, the author gives an example that we can write (12345) as (15)(14)(13)(12). I immediately recognized that this should always work (I proved it later.)

Then author says we can write :
(12345) = (54)(52)(21)(25)(23)(13)

I checked, yes this works. But how did the author get such a horrific looking way to write the permutation? I don't see any pattern here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no pattern. It is only meant to demonstrate that such a decomposition isn't unique. E.g. ##(52)(21)(25)=(15)##. Only the sign (odd/even) is an invariant.
 
  • Like
Likes nuuskur and Kaguro
:oops:😐😶
No pattern?

Well, I can see why (52)(21)(25) = (15)
But I can't see why (15) = (52)(21)(25)

I mean, did the author just try a lot of products of six 2-cycles and ended up with one which simplifies to (12345) ?
 
Last edited:
Kaguro said:
:oops:😐😶
No pattern?

Well, I can see why (52)(21)(25) = (15)
But I can't see why (15) = (52)(21)(25)

I mean, did the author just try a lot of products of six 2-cycles and ended up with one which simplifies to (12345) ?
I guess he took a representation with 4 transpositions and simply conjugated one of them.
 
fresh_42 said:
I guess he took a representation with 4 transpositions and simply conjugated one of them.
Uhhh...
I have no idea about conjugation yet.
I'll read this again in a few days.

Thanks.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top