Perron formula for matrix powers

  • Thread starter Thread starter bpet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Perron formula for matrix powers is expressed as p_{ij}^{(n)} = \sum_{s=1}^r \frac{1}{(v_s-1)!}\left\{\frac{d^{v_s-1}}{d\lambda^{v_s-1}}\left[\frac{\lambda^nA_{ji}(\lambda)(\lambda-\lambda_s)^{v_s}}{|\lambda I_m-P|}\right]\right\}_{\lambda=\lambda_s}, where r represents the number of distinct eigenvalues and A_{ji}(\lambda) is the cofactor related to the determinant of the matrix. This formula applies to any matrix, not limited to Markov transition probabilities. The derivation may involve the Laplace transform of e^{tP} and the extraction of terms from the Taylor series, potentially using Laurent series and partial fraction expansion to find residues at infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix theory and eigenvalues
  • Familiarity with Laplace transforms and Taylor series
  • Knowledge of determinants and cofactors in matrices
  • Experience with Laurent series and partial fraction expansion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the Perron formula in matrix analysis
  • Study the application of Laplace transforms in matrix exponentiation
  • Explore Gantmakher's Theory of Matrices for related concepts
  • Investigate Horn & Johnson's Matrix Analysis for general matrix functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in linear algebra, and students studying matrix theory who are interested in advanced matrix functions and their applications.

bpet
Messages
531
Reaction score
7
The following interesting result popped up in an old probability textbook (without proof or citations) and I'm curious to know how it can be derived.

The elements p_{ij}^{(n)} of matrix P^n (size m) are also determined by the Perron formula

p_{ij}^{(n)} = \sum_{s=1}^r \frac{1}{(v_s-1)!}\left\{\frac{d^{v_s-1}}{d\lambda^{v_s-1}}\left[\frac{\lambda^nA_{ji}(\lambda)(\lambda-\lambda_s)^{v_s}}{|\lambda I_m-P|}\right]\right\}_{\lambda=\lambda_s}

where r is the number of distinct eigenvalues, \lambda_s are the distinct eigenvalues with multiplicity v_s (so v_1+\ldots+v_s=m) and A_{ji}(\lambda) is the cofactor of the elements \lambda\delta_{ji}-p_{ji} in the determinant |\lambda I_m-P| and I_m is the identity matrix of the same size as P.

It seems to work for any matrix (not just Markov transition probabilities) and as far as I can tell it's not related to the Perron formula of number theory.

The term A_{ji}(\lambda)/|\lambda I_m-P| would hint that (\lambda I_m-P)^{-1} is involved, so I suspect it's done by finding the Laplace transform of e^{tP} and somehow extracting the nth term of the Taylor series. Is this on the right track and if so, how would it be done? In particular, how do they turn the expression into a sum of derivatives at the eigenvalues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you managed to derive the formula yet? If I had time I'd love to have a go...

Anyway, I did a little searching and found
http://crypto.mat.sbg.ac.at/~ste/diss/node12.html
There he cites pg 16 of
V. Romanovsky, Discrete Markov Chains.
but I couldn't get a copy of it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Simon_Tyler said:
Have you managed to derive the formula yet? If I had time I'd love to have a go...

Anyway, I did a little searching and found
http://crypto.mat.sbg.ac.at/~ste/diss/node12.html
There he cites pg 16 of
V. Romanovsky, Discrete Markov Chains.
but I couldn't get a copy of it.

Thanks, me neither. I haven't checked the details but think it can be done by finding the residue of \lambda^n(\lambda I-P)^{-1} at \lambda=\infty via Laurent series and partial fraction expansion.

The formula was in Sveshnikov's Problems in Probability (as a "basic formula", not an actual problem). The result might be discussed in Gantmakher's Theory of Matrices or Horn & Johnson's Matrix Analysis, possibly even for more general matrix functions, though I don't have copies of these to check.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K