Studying Perspectives of a former undergrad student in science

AI Thread Summary
Studying theoretical physics for 2.5 years raises questions about the feasibility of conducting serious research without a formal education. Engaging in self-study for about 2 hours daily and 3 hours weekly with a teacher may not suffice to produce influential research. Achieving this level typically requires completing a PhD, as most PhD students dedicate 8+ hours daily for 4-6 years to develop a comprehensive understanding of the field. Key components of successful research include grasping current trends, mastering various techniques, building an academic network, and honing writing and presentation skills. Additionally, hands-on experience with real materials and laboratory exercises is essential, as theoretical knowledge alone is insufficient for impactful research. Overall, pursuing a PhD is recommended for those aiming to contribute significantly to the field of theoretical physics.
Timothy S.
Messages
22
Reaction score
5
I was studying theoretical physics in the university for 2.5 years before giving up this speciality.
If I study physics ~2 hours daily plus 3 hours every weekend myself and individually with teacher, will I be able to do serious research (write papes that will be cited and will have influence on the physical science)?

P. S.
I might be too optimistic, because my friend (a BCS in theoretical physics) said that nowadays to be able to start some research in theoretical physics you need to study until you are 40.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your friend has the right of it, unfortunately. While 40 might be a slight exaggeration, it's highly unlikely that you'll get to the point where you can produce influential research without completing a formal education to the level of a PhD.
Keep in mind that most PhD students work on their studies more or less full time (i.e. 8+ hours per day) for 4-6 years or more. And from there, they go on to full-time post-doctoral work.
Over that time, in addition to simply developing a rigorous knowledge base in your field, you need to also:
  • understand current research trends and topics, what the big problems are (and the smaller problems that need to be solved to be make progress toward answering the bigger problems
  • understand the different techniques being used to tackle those problems... how they are expected to work, what their shortfalls are, etc.
  • develop skills in the application of those techniques
  • build up an academic network in your field (it's rare for people to work alone these days)
  • build skills in academic writing, presenting your ideas, and responding to critique
There's still value in learning for learning's sake, but realistically, I think if your end goal is to do research, the best avenue to get there is through the PhD route.
 
From post #1,
First part, you're misguided or need guiding.
Second part, BEFORE age 40 is also good, even better.

A little more: You need what is not in the books; what is not on paper which you ammend using pencil or pen; real materials and equipment which you use and interact with are very necessary. All the stuff on paper is dead. You need laboratory exercises to bring any of it to life.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Back
Top