Pertubation and density matrix

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of perturbation theory to a two-level system in the context of density matrices, specifically addressing the time-dependent nature of steady-state solutions. The author questions how a steady-state solution can exhibit time dependence, referencing a text by Robert W. Boyd. Participants clarify that steady-state solutions can still be time-dependent, as seen in systems like forced harmonic oscillators, which can maintain periodic behavior while being in a steady state. The conversation also touches on the physical significance of the first-order solutions in the context of population inversion, emphasizing the need to consider both w_1 and w_{-1} for a complete understanding. The confusion about time independence in steady-state solutions is acknowledged, highlighting the complexity of these concepts in nonlinear optics.
KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi there, I am reading a text by Robert W. Boyd "Nonlinear optics", in page 228, he used pertubation theory on two-level system and let the steady-state solution of the dynamics equation of density matrix as

w = w_0 + w_1 e^{-i\delta t} + w_{-1}e^{i\delta t}

where w=\rho_{bb} - \rho_{aa} is the inversion of population between level b (excited) and level a (ground), \Omega+\delta is the frequency of the probe field, \Omega is the frequency of the pump field. I have few questions

1) the author said the solution shown above is steady-state solution, but why it is time-dependent?

2) we know that, w must be real, so w_1=w_{-1}^*, but if for w_1 only, is there any physical significance? Why we have to consider the first-order solution like that? What contribution of w_1 and w_{-1} made?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Steady-state solutions need not be independent of time. (Consider the case of a forced harmonic oscillator)
 
weejee said:
1) Steady-state solutions need not be independent of time. (Consider the case of a forced harmonic oscillator)

Yes, in that case, it is time dependent. But this is so confusing. In wiki, about steady state (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady_state), it puts : "A system in a steady state has numerous properties that are unchanging in time. ..." So if the properties are unchanging in time, why it can be time related?

Moreover, for the problem I mentioned above, it is about several first-order ODEs. It obtins the steady soultions by solving the equations when the time derivative of the variables equal to ZERO. If the time derivative of the variables equal ZERO, the only possibiliy is the solution is time-independent or constant, isn't it?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K