Pertubation and density matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of perturbation theory to a two-level system as described in Robert W. Boyd's "Nonlinear Optics." The steady-state solution of the density matrix dynamics is represented as w = w_0 + w_1 e^{-i\delta t} + w_{-1}e^{i\delta t}, where w denotes the population inversion between the excited state b and the ground state a. Participants clarify that steady-state solutions can exhibit time dependence, as seen in forced harmonic oscillators, despite common misconceptions regarding the definition of steady state. The conversation highlights the necessity of considering both w_1 and w_{-1} in the analysis of the system's behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with density matrix formalism
  • Knowledge of two-level quantum systems
  • Basic concepts of steady-state solutions in dynamical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of perturbation theory in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the density matrix dynamics in more complex systems
  • Investigate the role of time-dependent solutions in steady-state systems
  • Learn about forced harmonic oscillators and their relation to quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers in nonlinear optics seeking to deepen their understanding of perturbation theory and density matrix dynamics.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
Hi there, I am reading a text by Robert W. Boyd "Nonlinear optics", in page 228, he used pertubation theory on two-level system and let the steady-state solution of the dynamics equation of density matrix as

[tex]w = w_0 + w_1 e^{-i\delta t} + w_{-1}e^{i\delta t}[/tex]

where [tex]w=\rho_{bb} - \rho_{aa}[/tex] is the inversion of population between level b (excited) and level a (ground), [tex]\Omega+\delta[/tex] is the frequency of the probe field, [tex]\Omega[/tex] is the frequency of the pump field. I have few questions

1) the author said the solution shown above is steady-state solution, but why it is time-dependent?

2) we know that, [tex]w[/tex] must be real, so [tex]w_1=w_{-1}^*[/tex], but if for [tex]w_1[/tex] only, is there any physical significance? Why we have to consider the first-order solution like that? What contribution of [tex]w_1[/tex] and [tex]w_{-1}[/tex] made?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Steady-state solutions need not be independent of time. (Consider the case of a forced harmonic oscillator)
 
weejee said:
1) Steady-state solutions need not be independent of time. (Consider the case of a forced harmonic oscillator)

Yes, in that case, it is time dependent. But this is so confusing. In wiki, about steady state (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady_state), it puts : "A system in a steady state has numerous properties that are unchanging in time. ..." So if the properties are unchanging in time, why it can be time related?

Moreover, for the problem I mentioned above, it is about several first-order ODEs. It obtins the steady soultions by solving the equations when the time derivative of the variables equal to ZERO. If the time derivative of the variables equal ZERO, the only possibiliy is the solution is time-independent or constant, isn't it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K