Perturbation theory for solving a second-order ODE

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on applying perturbation theory to solve a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) involving a non-linear term. The user introduced a small parameter, epsilon, into the equation but encountered divergence when calculating the first-order term. They are seeking methods to sum divergent series and clarification on how to handle the perturbation series when raised to a power. There is also a debate about the correct formulation of the equation, as a misunderstanding could lead to different solution approaches. The conversation emphasizes the challenges of perturbation theory and the need for accurate equation representation.
Robin04
Messages
259
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
##\ddot{\xi}(t)=-b\xi (t)+\cos{(\omega t)}(a-c \xi^2(t))##, where ##a, b, c## are constants
Relevant Equations
-
I have to solve the equation above. I haven't heard about an exact method so I tried to apply perturbation theory. I don't know much about it so I would like to ask for some help.
First I put an ##\epsilon## in the coefficient of the non-linear ##\xi^2(t)## term:
##\ddot{\xi}(t)=-b\xi (t)+\cos{(\omega t)}(a-\epsilon c\xi^2(t))##
I calculated to the first order term and it was diverging. I heard that there are some methods that can help to sum a divergent series. Can you suggest any that can work here?
Also, next I tried to put ##\epsilon## in the exponent of the non-linear term, but when I substitute the series into the equation I don't know how to raise the series to the power ##\epsilon##.
So basically ##(\xi_0+\epsilon \xi_1+\epsilon^2 \xi_2+...)^{2 \epsilon}=?##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How sure are you that the equation reads $$\ddot{\xi} = -b\xi + \cos(\omega t)(a-c\xi^2)$$ and not instead $$\dot{\xi} = -b\xi + \cos(\omega t)(a-c\xi^2).$$ I only ask because the latter is an Ricatti equation and thus exactly solvable.

Robin04 said:
I calculated to the first order term and it was diverging. I heard that there are some methods that can help to sum a divergent series.

If you only have calculated the pertubation series upto first order, then how can the series be divergent if it is finite?
 
William Crawford said:
How sure are you that the equation reads
I'm sure, it is an equation of motion.
William Crawford said:
If you only have calculated the pertubation series upto first order, then how can the series be divergent if it is finite?
I meant it in the sense that this equation comes up as a part of an approximation method to a certain motion, and the unperturbed solution gives a much better approximation than with the first order term included, so I figured I don't have to go to second order.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K