PF Electrons, quarks, planets, etc. How does it work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a playful ranking system on the PF forum where members are categorized as electrons, quarks, and other entities based on their participation and trophy points. This classification system, established about 15 years ago, is viewed as a lighthearted and somewhat silly aspect of the community. Some members appreciate the humor it brings, while others express concern about potential negative self-perceptions tied to these titles. Overall, the system serves as a fun way to engage users and enhance their experience on the forum. The conversation highlights the balance between enjoyment and the potential for misinterpretation of these playful labels.
Albertus Magnus
Gold Member
Messages
27
Reaction score
27
I have noticed that some individuals here at PF are electrons, some quarks others are various other kinds of entities. I sense that it is some kind ranking system? How does it work and what is the full system of classification?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's something cute we did maybe 15 years ago. As you participate more and more, your "size" will increase.
 
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus
It depends on your trophy points.
 
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus
It's all very silly if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE, Greg Bernhardt and Albertus Magnus
PeroK said:
It's all very silly if you ask me.
That's easy for you to say you're a supercluster!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes PeroK, weirdoguy and Albertus Magnus
Some people like silly. I don't mind, some silliness can push you through a bad day. "Ok, i'm not that usless, i'm a PF mountain!"

obraz_2025-02-27_073622132.png


On a second thought, that can also turn bad, "I'm so fat that even PF calls me a mountain".
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Albertus Magnus and pinball1970
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top