PF PHOTO CONTEST - Bad Picture 3 (8/2-8/8)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a photo contest themed around "bad pictures," where participants are encouraged to submit photos that are technically poor due to issues like fuzziness, underexposure, or overexposure. The rules specify that photos must be taken accidentally, without digital manipulation, and only one submission per member is allowed. Participants share their experiences with taking bad photos, often involving humorous anecdotes about their attempts to capture images of pets, particularly cats and butterflies. Many express a tendency to delete poor-quality images immediately, while others reflect on the comedic value of their "bad" shots. The conversation also includes playful banter about the nature of the submitted photos, with some participants joking about the peculiarities of their images, such as glowing animals or abstract shapes. Overall, the thread highlights a lighthearted community engagement with photography and the shared experience of capturing imperfect moments.
  • #31
lisab said:
Isn't it funny that several of these 'bad' shots involve cats? Dang felines - notoriously uncooperative!

So far the only shot I found and I could use in the contest is a picture of... cat :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Borek said:
So far the only shot I found and I could use in the contest is a picture of... cat :smile:

:smile: Well then, let's see it!
 
  • #33
lisab said:
Isn't it funny that several of these 'bad' shots involve cats? Dang felines - notoriously uncooperative!

I know! They're notorious for not playing along. Lie on the floor to be at an even level with them and what do they do? They come over to you to see what you're doing. The nerve. And! You'd at least think they'd have the courtesy to learn English.

Also, unlike dogs who, when told to "stay" tend to do just that. Cats? pfft.

Borek said:
Perhaps you don't take enough butterfly pictures, I am deleting hundreds of similar things :-p

You're right. I can't spot a blurry butterfly in a photograph because I don't take enough pictures of them. You caught me. :biggrin:
 
  • #34
[picture removed by request]

I hit and displaced the tripod while moving around the red flashlight :)
bad enough?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #35
Alex:) said:
I hit and displaced the tripod while moving around the red flashlight :)
bad enough?

Oooooooooo... :cool: .
 
  • #36
Ok, I have a bad angle picture of the fruit bat along the lines of larkspur's picture, and some really out of focus ones, but I have an eerie alien rabbit giving off green rays and a spectoral squirrel in mid air in one photo along with weird lights. I have no idea how it happened since the next shot just shows a perfectly normal landscape.

Which do you guys want?

I don't think the alien bunny is winning material but it's weird.
 
  • #37
Alex:) said:
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/5521/dsc01518yw3.jpg

I hit and displaced the tripod while moving around the red flashlight :)
bad enough?

bad?----that is ONE INTERESTING photo, there, bud------that could win some photo contest
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #38
rewebster said:
bad?----that is ONE INTERESTING photo, there, bud------that could win some photo contest

Disqualified then :smile:
 
  • #39
Evo said:
Ok, I have a bad angle picture of the fruit bat along the lines of larkspur's picture, and some really out of focus ones, but I have an eerie alien rabbit giving off green rays and a spectoral squirrel in mid air in one photo along with weird lights. I have no idea how it happened since the next shot just shows a perfectly normal landscape.

Which do you guys want?

I don't think the alien bunny is winning material but it's weird.

Bad angles are not uncommon but weird aliens are definitely original. So that's what I would vote for.
 
  • #40
Picture%20082.jpg
 
  • #41
Do I understand correctly that Zenparticle shot is so bad it even doesn't exist?

I have several similar shots on my negatives - just an empty space.
 
  • #42
Borek said:
Do I understand correctly that Zenparticle shot is so bad it even doesn't exist?

I have several similar shots on my negatives - just an empty space.

Maybe it's a picture of an "X". If so, it's a pretty good shot, and probably doesn't qualify for this contest.
 
  • #43
Honestly you guys can't see it? I can...
 
  • #44
Zenparticle said:
Honestly you guys can't see it? I can...

Maybe some can, but I just get an "X". What image server do you use?
 
  • #45
Ok this is strange no I don't see anything either, but I saw it when i logged on- I was using picasa let me try and fix that sorry!
 
  • #46
I'm not even getting an "X" - just a blank post with no characters, no image, nada.
 
  • #47
http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/9756/picture082pk0.jpg

Hope you can see this one!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #48
No idea what is bad about this picture - these are not its glasses?
 
  • #49
http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/7330/e314152e1445dd4502db9a4kd5.jpg

I was in the car and the car moved when I was trying to take a picture.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #50
So far the "bad" photos containing lights are incredible images. :biggrin:

Borek said:
No idea what is bad about this picture - these are not its glasses?

:smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #51
Great one!

But no "badiness" if you ask me :wink: This one will better fit "city lights" or "light in motion".
 
  • #52
Borek said:
Great one!

But no "badiness" if you ask me :wink: This one will better fit "city lights" or "light in motion".

Actually it's bad because I didn't get the picture I wanted and it wasn't supposed to be streaky. :smile:
 
  • #53
Those are all beautiful pictures!

Ok, mine is really BAD, in about as bad as a picture can get. I was told that it's like one of those old "Magic Eye" pictures where you don't see anything until after you stare at it a bit.

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/417/camerapictures295ae1.jpg

The picture has a rabbit and two squirrels. See if you can find them. Here is the link to the picture I snapped 3 seconds after this one if you want to see what the picture was of.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1823921&postcount=237
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #54
What a beautiful bad picture Christina.

And erm :rolleyes: Evo, I though this was a photo contest, isn't it. How did you get a hold of that excellent top painting of Barnett Newman from his grey period (1961-1964), called "Who is afraid of grey red and white". :-p
 
  • #55
Evo said:
Those are all beautiful pictures!

Ok, mine is really BAD, in about as bad as a picture can get. I was told that it's like one of those old "Magic Eye" pictures where you don't see anything until after you stare at it a bit.


The picture has a rabbit and two squirrels. See if you can find them. Here is the link to the picture I snapped 3 seconds after this one if you want to see what the picture was of.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1823921&postcount=237

It's cool...at first it's just blur, but as you stare for a while the bunny and squirrel come through like ghosts...<squint!>...I can only make out one squirrel...
 
  • #56
The other squirrel is jumping into the frame from the left. Excellent action shot Evo. Disqualified!
 
  • #57
I have these pictures of a cave from China in which the water dropping in the cave kept being focused by my camera instead of the scenery that I was trying to capture. Its a shame that I deleted them. The memory card on our camera is so small.
 
  • #58
The far left there is one squirrel leaping in Lisa.
 
  • #59
Ooohh...I see it now!
 
  • #60
Evo, why are the animals glowing with bright devil-eyes? Was this place near Love Canal or Three Mile Island?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K