PF Photography: Tips, Tricks, & Photo Sharing

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread focuses on various aspects of photography, including tips for taking better photos, sharing personal images, and discussing techniques for image manipulation. Participants share their experiences, seek advice, and showcase their work, covering both technical and creative elements of photography.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire for pointers in photography, noting their inexperience.
  • Several participants share links to their photos, discussing the qualities of their images, such as focus and background.
  • There are suggestions for image hosting services and guidelines for photo sizes to avoid clutter.
  • Image manipulation software, specifically GIMP, is recommended for enhancing photos.
  • One participant notes that their dog photo appears dull and seeks advice on improving its appearance.
  • Another participant points out a blue tint in a dog photo and suggests adjusting the color balance to warm it up.
  • Participants discuss the challenges of photographing wildlife, with some sharing their experiences and techniques.
  • There are discussions about the use of high f-stop settings to achieve specific effects in photographs.
  • Some participants express admiration for each other's work, highlighting specific aspects like detail and composition.
  • Advice is given on joining photography groups for constructive criticism to improve skills.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share tips and experiences, but there are varying opinions on techniques and preferences for photo editing and styles. The discussion includes both agreement on the value of certain tools and differing views on how to achieve desired effects in photography.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific technical aspects, such as focal lengths and f-stop settings, but there is no consensus on the best practices for all scenarios. The discussion also reflects a range of skill levels and personal preferences in photography.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in photography, from beginners seeking advice to more experienced photographers looking for community feedback and tips on improving their work.

  • #871
Even though this isn't a very interesting picture, it's the first one that I've played with using DPP. Since it's winter, everything here is dead, and this was taken on a cloudy day around noon.

Original:
IMG_0174-small-orig.jpg


Edited with DPP:
IMG_0174-small.jpg


I think I may have gone a bit too far with the color saturation. I'm also making this post to make sure I'm converting, resizing, and uploading pictures correctly.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #872
You have to start with something :smile:

You could try to take the picture from slightly different angle, to change the background to less noisy. I would try as a background either the white patch of snow or soil without sticks - it doesn't have to help, but it is just always an option to consider. You already have low DoF - that's good for this type of picture.
 
  • #873
Andy Resnick said:
Personally, I've decided not to use zoom lenses. I'm not happy with the amount of aberration that results from the design constraints. To be sure, there are zooms that are simply amazing- but a good prime lens will beat a zoom lens, every time.
..

This sounds like one generation back. The standard work horse for the modern professional photographers is the 70-200mm nowadays (Canon, Nikon) and not a prime. Not sure if there are primes beating their performance.
 
  • #874
Andy Resnick said:
I'm having problems with yellow/orange/red- the printer output is completely oversaturated, even when the image looks ok on my monitor. I've tried to adjust the monitor by calibration- I printed out a color test page, took pictures of it, and tried to get the display to look like the printout. That helped, but in the end I just can't trust my eyes.

BTW- your submitted photo is *fantastic*. Did you happen to get a close-up shot of one of those ice 'flakes'?

Sorry to hear Andy. That's a nasty handicap, maybe it helps if you can find somebody to judge the editting. Maybe you can also learn to interpret the color histograms and work with that.

For the submitted picture, unfortunately I was unable to bring my gear and I had only my point and shoot available. This is a life size crop, showing that you should never leave home without DSLR and macro lens.

2wecl03.jpg
 
  • #875
Andre said:
This sounds like one generation back. The standard work horse for the modern professional photographers is the 70-200mm nowadays (Canon, Nikon) and not a prime. Not sure if there are primes beating their performance.

Those are nice lenses- but I don't use long focal lengths.
 
  • #876
Andre said:
Sorry to hear Andy. That's a nasty handicap, maybe it helps if you can find somebody to judge the editting. Maybe you can also learn to interpret the color histograms and work with that.

For the submitted picture, unfortunately I was unable to bring my gear and I had only my point and shoot available. This is a life size crop, showing that you should never leave home without DSLR and macro lens.

Heh... I'm not sure it's a handicap. After all, I don't get fooled by camouflage either :)

But yes- I *must* work directly with the histograms.

Those ice flakes really astound me- gigantic dendritic crystals. Fantastic.
 
  • #877
Borek said:
You have to start with something :smile:

You could try to take the picture from slightly different angle, to change the background to less noisy. I would try as a background either the white patch of snow or soil without sticks - it doesn't have to help, but it is just always an option to consider. You already have low DoF - that's good for this type of picture.

Thanks, Borek. That's a good idea (getting rid of the busy background). I'm going to try and find something more pleasing to the eye for my next shot.
 
  • #878
The melting in my backyard pond looks similar to an area of the original Mandelbrot set. And there are smaller copies near the back of the pond.

fractalmelt.jpg
 
  • #879
Last edited:
  • #880
Hey turbo, there's a deer in your pic! :biggrin:

Nice pics Andre, how old is the young Arabian? 1.5?
 
  • #881
Ah, drizzle, I think 2.5 actually, her dad traded it recently for another horse.
 
  • #882
Andre said:
girl can be hired as a model, I made that portefolio.
Very nice, Andre. At 5'7" with a fairly athletic build, she could get work here modeling for LL Bean, Woolrich, Cabela's, Patagonia, etc. A good friend of mine in college did just that. Average height with a curvy figure wouldn't get her any fashion modeling jobs, but she was a shoo-in for modeling outdoor clothing, etc. It's an area that was called "sports modeling" back then, and I don't know if that has evolved in the past 40 years, but she did a lot of shoots as the catalog companies changed their clothing lines.

Her portfolio was not large, but was well-done, and her scrapbook was very impressive, even by the time I met her at 18. She got lots of work as a teen. She'd cut out the pictures from the catalogs, mount them and label them with captions like "XXX outfitting company, Spring 1968" etc. Pretty good sales pitch if she went on an open call. Just show them the scrap-book, so they know how long she has been working and how often she had been featured in print ads. Smart girl.
 
  • #883
drizzle said:
Hey turbo, there's a deer in your pic! :biggrin:
I wish! He'd be in the freezer right now!
 
  • #884
I think the pic I submitted for the current photo contest looks very unreal and photoshopped maybe.

Andre said:
b6v905.jpg

But it's definitely natural. It was taken at Montcru this summer. In a clear night quite a lot of fog can accumulate in the valley below. This shot was taken at 8:02 AM:

353e14j.jpg


So eventually when the sun warms up the fog it starts to lift and drift up on the hill side and when those little fog patches pass along the bright sun, you get this extreme effect. The shot in the contest was taken at 8:28am only half an hour later from the tree group on the left.
 
Last edited:
  • #885
A few more pix taken that same morning during those magical blinded-by-the-light moments:

r2miib.jpg


p0xg7.jpg


11uhwch.jpg


viplky.jpg


2d2bztf.jpg


Also to convince Borek, Marzena and other enthousiast photographers or enjoyers of nature, that Montcru is the place to be for that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #886
I have no doubts it is an interesting place to visit. From what I read lately (in Vanished Kingdoms by Norman Davies) it is also an area with interesting history.
 
  • #887
I've seen similar effects too, and almost always under somewhat (but not overly) foggy conditions.

Here's one I took in the late fall that shows a similar behavior:

15qcbkk.png
 
  • #888
Nice, Gokul! The chromatic dispersion is my favorite part.
 
  • #889
Here are a few more from a very wet / foggy / sunny morning on Montcru in August.

2rymy6s.jpg


Tobias -just as black as Gizmo- checking out the fog below.

2ykcfet.jpg


Accumulating dew drops on a leaf.

j6757n.jpg


just a few steps away from the first tree.

20i83e9.jpg


just above the pond

212voxy.jpg


Very wet dandelion

1zceqo3.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 2rymy6s.jpg
    2rymy6s.jpg
    3 KB · Views: 353
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #890
Gizmooooo :faints:
Really nice. It'll definitely be my phone's background.

Love these pics Andre.

PS, I can't see some of these pics, they appear gray! :(
 
  • #891
Sorry, drizzly Actually, that's Tobias,

2v84kex.gif


All pix seem fine for me. Maybe you can copy the url and try the pix to open in separate windows or tabs.
 
  • #892
drizzle said:
I can't see some of these pics, they appear gray! :(

That's OK, haven't you read? It was foggy.
 
  • #893
Really, really, awesome pictures here!
 
  • #894
Thanks,

I uploaded most of those pix http://rapidshare.com/files/435863500/aaapix.zip in their original uncropped size (5184 x 3456 pixels). It's a big file, but high quality and you could print it on poster size.

So by my guest and get them. I think the downloads are limited, so if it doesn't work, please let me know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #895
Very effective use of fog/dew/sun Pooh! Lovely shots, all.
 
  • #896
So I saw this photo contest, colorful abstract on another site. So I looked around me in da house and made a couple of piX and I submitted this one:

11wddep.jpg
 
  • #897
Cool Andre! Lovely. I'm just trying to guess what could this be part of, an art work?
 
  • #898
Sort of, drizzle, it's creative embroidery with a sewing machine.
 
  • #899
Andre said:
So I saw this photo contest, colorful abstract on another site. So I looked around me in da house and made a couple of piX and I submitted this one:

Like!

I dig how the yellow cuts upward, like a flame... were you 'going' for anything in particular?
 
  • #900
My wife says "Cool! I want a blouse covered with that!" I asked if she wanted it so that she would fit in at hippie weddings at the South Solon Meeting House, and she said "No. It would only be for dress-up on special occasions."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K