PF Photography: Tips, Tricks, & Photo Sharing

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around photography tips and sharing personal experiences with capturing images. Participants offer advice on hosting photos, suggesting platforms like ImageShack and emphasizing the importance of image size to maintain thread readability. Several users share their photos, including pets and wildlife, discussing composition, focus, and post-processing techniques. There is a focus on improving image quality through tools like GIMP for editing, with discussions about color balance and white balance settings to enhance photos. Users also exchange feedback on each other's work, highlighting the importance of constructive criticism for growth in photography skills. Additionally, there are mentions of joining photography groups for more in-depth critiques and learning opportunities. The conversation touches on the challenges of capturing wildlife and the technical aspects of photography, such as aperture settings and lens choices, while fostering a supportive community for beginners and experienced photographers alike.
  • #241
Andre said:
Better seasons will be here soon, Turbo, can't wait to capture the natural -rather rare- Pulsatilla vulgaris (in Dutch "wild mans herb") blooming very soon here, probably the end of the week

B350-0901020.jpg

What's the usable part of the herb, Andre, and what does it get used for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #242
larkspur said:
WOW! That is a lot of snow!
And that is the reduced snow-depth due to a couple of thaws and a couple of heavy rains. We are at severe risk for floods if spring brings us extended cold followed by several days of warm rainy weather.
 
  • #243
turbo-1 said:
What's the usable part of the herb, Andre, and what does it get used for?

I see that it is called Pasque Flower. It grows here on the mountain, where I live. But we just had a few inches of snow, so it's probably burried now.

This herb is poisenous, the dried leaves is an old medicine for all kind of diseases.
 
  • #244
BobG said:
I like the circular polarizer. I have a Coolpix 5000 since I don't really have the time and patience for an SLR (I don't think turbo would like it, though - it has a very slow response). It's still hard not to get sucked in with so much nice scenery here to photograph, so I ordered a wide angle lens and a telephoto lens with the filters thrown in along with the package. Tried them out yesterday morning and I'm pretty happy with the results. Here's a sample:

http://img165.imageshack.us/img165/9792/dscn0315akz0.jpg
Last one touched up on the computer

Awsome...I really need a polarizer. The one for the nikon 58mm size I think is about $90 and I can't get it at the larger stores near me. Since it's the multicoated lens it's more expensive than the lens' that are coated less and I can't get it unless I order it online. Unfortunately I'm not sure how reliable or safe it is to order from that site.

Andre said:
Well in many cases you may find a tripod a necesary gadget

The lightest DSLR is probably the Olympus E-400/E-410 with an excellent value for money

About range to subject:

Well try to back off to one meter distance in a butterfly house to get this:

orange-2.JPG


and you will find two-three people jumping in front of you, trying to get the same picture.

true, but I'm referring to the larger mammals :smile:

Really? I paid something like $280 in an AAFCE shop in Europe, which is fortunate since the average price in Europe for camera's in general is more in Euro than it is in dollars in the US. This FZ8 should not be confused with it bigger brother, the FZ18, which retails for about 375$. That's a fun camera to play with, omnipotential, but with slightly inferior pictures. I don't want to concede on quality and of course the Leica lenses are superior to the competition.

I got confused with the panasonic lumix with another camera...oops.
I don't know about olympus slr's ...I think there's a reason that they're so cheap. I know someone who uses the e500 and I'm not impressed by the quality...=( that's why I chose my cam even though it was more expensive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #245
larkspur said:
http://www.jmg-galleries.com/blog/2007/05/01/philosophy-of-photography-photograph-versus-a-snapshot/"
It made me think about how I take a picture. When I look through the lens I compose a scene before I press the shutter button. I will pan the area while looking through the lense until the composition is what I am looking for. If I don't think it would look good blown up and hung on a wall I won't take the shot...I find I take less and less photos because my standards have risen (too high maybe). I no longer take a photo to document that I have been there but rather take a photo to bring the scene home with me. I also delete a lot of photos. If they aren't perfect I won't keep them anymore just because I took them.

What do you think about when taking a shot?

I think that that taking pics of the landscape is quite different from taking pictures of animals. I can't usually compose a shot. (I wish there was enough time to though) I have to wait awhile sometimes and I think it pays off.

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9175/polarwarsbywhitepegasusek4.jpg
I swear this bear has some sort of skin problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #246
~christina~ said:
I know someone who uses the e500 and I'm not impressed by the quality...=( that's why I chose my cam even though it was more expensive.

Well it's about a par if you'd compare the score of both latest (E510 instead of E500) judged by the experts:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond40x/page27.asp
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse510/page31.asp

So it's indeed an excellent camera.

Personally, I'll looking a bit at the http://www.dpreview.com/shop/merchants.asp?id=sony_dslra300 since I it seems that I can use my old Minolta lenses again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #247
~christina~ said:
I think that that taking pics of the landscape is quite different from taking pictures of animals. I can't usually compose a shot. (I wish there was enough time to though) I have to wait awhile sometimes and I think it pays off.
Yes, landscapes are different from wildlife photography but good composition is still required. Just zooming in on your subject has changed the composition of the shot. You probably do a lot of through the lens adjustments that affect the final composition without realizing it.
 
  • #248
~christina~ said:
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9175/polarwarsbywhitepegasusek4.jpg
I swear this bear has some sort of skin problem.

And an attitude problem! Great shot!


Has anyone much experience with night photography? I gave it a proper try for the first time last night with mixed success. How do you deal with the wide range of light intensities that you find? I found that a lot of shots were too dominated by light sources (streetlights etc) if i had a long enough exposure to illuminate the details of a scene. There was also an unpleasant orange hue in many shots, which i could eliminate somewhat by a shutter speed/aperture a little less than the display on my camera advised, but at the expense of underexposing the scene a tad. Any tips? Am i missing anything obvious here?

Here are a couple of my better shots:
2332707653_1c63b6161c.jpg


2333530956_274386aae1.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #249
matthyaouw said:
And an attitude problem! Great shot!Has anyone much experience with night photography? I gave it a proper try for the first time last night with mixed success. How do you deal with the wide range of light intensities that you find? I found that a lot of shots were too dominated by light sources (streetlights etc) if i had a long enough exposure to illuminate the details of a scene. There was also an unpleasant orange hue in many shots, which i could eliminate somewhat by a shutter speed/aperture a little less than the display on my camera advised, but at the expense of underexposing the scene a tad. Any tips? Am i missing anything obvious here?

Here are a couple of my better shots:

Those turned out great! Night shots are difficult to expose correctly and many people will take bracketed shots and then combine in HDR. I took a few late evening shots a while ago. I didn't know about bracketing at the time or I think I could have had better results.
307099988_f183f59cb8.jpg
316120946_523ed8cab7.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #250
larkspur said:
Those turned out great! Night shots are difficult to expose correctly and many people will take bracketed shots and then combine in HDR. I took a few late evening shots a while ago. I didn't know about bracketing at the time or I think I could have had better results.

Thanks! They are few among many though- most aren't worth seeing. I guess that's the advantage of digital- I can waste as many shots as I like on experimentation without having to shell out for film/printing. I've not tried HDR yet but I'm sure I'll give it a go at some point.

I love the picture of the bridge. The reflection and the angle is great.
 
  • #251
Basset Attack!

Simon.jpg


Focused.jpg


Simon5.jpg


Fred2.jpg


FredSlobber.jpg


Focused2.jpg
 
  • #252
A little resemblance...

FredSlobber.jpg

http://www.masterpiecepumpkins.com/Graphics/AlfredHitchcock%20%20_orig.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #253
Mech_Engineer said:
Basset Attack!

Simon.jpg


Focused.jpg


Simon5.jpg


Fred2.jpg


FredSlobber.jpg


Focused2.jpg

Love those! My fav is the smiling one.
 
  • #254
M&Ms Pastels

Light tent macro lens shots from today.
2336510538_7195dd310b.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #255
larkspur said:
Light tent macro lens shots from today.
2336510538_7195dd310b.jpg

I just love that, larkspur.
 
  • #256
GeorginaS said:
I just love that, larkspur.
Thanks!
 
  • #257
Black and White Rose

I don't have much experience with b&w photography. Thought I would turn this pink rose into black and white...
What do you think? more contrast needed?

2342041154_67dc3ae79d_o.jpg
 
  • #258
There is a lot of grain and banding in the image that I see, larkspur. I realize that there are a lot of artifacts involved in processing, and lots of the images I post here suffer from similar faults. That said, I love the composition, and the dynamic range is nice.

I'm still learning how to deal with DSLRs, so if you can improve this image, I would be very grateful for any hints as to how you pull it off. I'm a film dinosaur.
 
  • #259
The banding showed up when I downsized it to 650...not sure how to fix it.
 
  • #260
That might be a clue, larkspur! Maybe I should try downsizing the image first, then applying any processing (brightness/contrast) to see if that reduces the artifacts. Thanks!
 
  • #261
Here it is after flickr downsized it no banding:

2339342176_b507e5ba2c.jpg
 
  • #262
I know these aren't anything "special". Hope I can share though.

bike-1.jpg


Picture402865.jpg


clouds-1.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #263
Holocene said:
I know these aren't anything "special". Hope I can share though.

I enjoyed these Holocene. Thanks for sharing.
 
  • #264
Nice. That middle one looks similar to Kingsbury Pond - a place where my friends and I often stop for a bite and a breather when riding.
 
  • #265
larkspur said:
Here it is after flickr downsized it no banding:

2339342176_b507e5ba2c.jpg

WOW :!) that's a cool pic!
 
  • #266
lisab said:
WOW :!) that's a cool pic!

Thanks Lisa!
 
  • #267
matthyaouw said:
And an attitude problem! Great shot!


Has anyone much experience with night photography? I gave it a proper try for the first time last night with mixed success. How do you deal with the wide range of light intensities that you find? I found that a lot of shots were too dominated by light sources (streetlights etc) if i had a long enough exposure to illuminate the details of a scene. There was also an unpleasant orange hue in many shots, which i could eliminate somewhat by a shutter speed/aperture a little less than the display on my camera advised, but at the expense of underexposing the scene a tad. Any tips? Am i missing anything obvious here?

Here are a couple of my better shots:

Have you taken any more shots lately?
 
  • #268
My older daughter Spawn took this picture of a bird the other day. She's just learning to use the camera, a Canon G9, amazing detail on the feathers.

http://img386.imageshack.us/img386/7873/ezekiel491fr7.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #269
Amazing picture and a nice camera, Evo, But colors should not be discouraged.
 
  • #270
larkspur said:
Light tent macro lens shots from today.
2336510538_7195dd310b.jpg

That looks like something I would do! Actually, I was going to photograph m&ms about 20 some odd years ago. I was going to take about 3 to 5 pounds of m&ms and then make a puzzle.

I am interested in hearing what tricks you guys have for night time photography too, I have failed so far. The only way I can take a shot is with the camera's built in settings of fireworks or nighttime. I can't seem to do ANYTHING with my manual settings, which is what I need to use my remote control, so most of my photos come out slightly blurry from manually pressing the shutter. I miss the days of shutter cables! I need to take classes, but haven't been able to yet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K