Phase factors and Modulus Square?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the manipulation of quantum mechanical operators, specifically the raising and lowering operators, denoted as ##L_+=L_x+iL_y## and ##L_-=L_x-iL_y##. The user KQ6UP seeks clarification on the implications of taking the modulus square of the matrix element ##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x+i\hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle##, questioning whether the constant ##c## can be negative or imaginary. The consensus is that ##c## is conventionally taken as a positive real number, and any phase factors can be incorporated as ##ce^{i\phi}## without affecting the overall calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly angular momentum operators.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of matrix elements and their significance in quantum states.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their manipulation in quantum contexts.
  • Proficiency in using the raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of raising and lowering operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of phase factors in quantum states and their mathematical representation.
  • Explore the properties of matrix elements in quantum mechanics, focusing on their physical interpretations.
  • Investigate the role of modulus squares in quantum mechanics and their significance in probability amplitudes.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists working with angular momentum, and researchers interested in operator algebra and matrix elements in quantum theory.

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
If I have something like:

$$\lvert \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x+i\hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle \rvert ^2=c$$.

where ##c## is any old real number. If I undid the modulus square to find:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x+i\hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle=\pm \sqrt{c} $$ Would I not have to consider ##c## as being negative, positive as well as imaginary negative positive? So:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x+i\hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle=\pm i \sqrt{c} $$ as well.

I am trying to get to:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x \rvert M-1 \rangle=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{c} $$

and:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle=-\frac{i}{2} \sqrt{c} $$

From Landau and Lifshitz QM 3ed page 89, and I am not following. Any tips will be appreciated.

Thanks,
KQ6UP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need the raising and lowering operators: ## L_+=L_x+iL_y ## and ## L_-=L_x-iL_y ##. You can solve for ## L_x ## and ## L_y ## and substitute. The computations are straightforward using the formulas for the result of ## L_+ ## and ## L_- ## operating on the state ## | M > ## (or ## | M-1> ##, etc.).
 
Charles Link said:
You need the raising and lowering operators: ## L_+=L_x+iL_y ## and ## L_-=L_x-iL_y ##. You can solve for ## L_x ## and ## L_y ## and substitute. The computations are straightforward using the formulas for the result of ## L_+ ## and ## L_- ## operating on the state ## | M > ## (or ## | M-1> ##, etc.).

That is where I started before ##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_+ \rvert M-1 \rangle=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##, and I am trying to get to:

##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x \rvert M-1 \rangle=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##

Thanks,
KQ6UP
 
kq6up said:
That is where I started before ##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_+ \rvert M-1 \rangle=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##, and I am trying to get to:

##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x \rvert M-1 \rangle=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##

Thanks,
KQ6UP
You can readily compute ## L_x=(L_++L_-)/2 ## . ## \\ ## ## L_- |M-1> ## will give some number times ## |M-2> ##. The matrix element ## <M|M-2> =0 ## and ## <M|M> =1 ##. Also note ## L_+|M-1>=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}|M> ##.
 
Charles Link said:
You can readily compute ## L_x=(L_++L_-)/2 ## . ## \\ ## ## L_- |M-1> ## will give some number times ## |M-2> ##. The matrix element ## <M|M-2> =0 ## and ## <M|M> =1 ##. Also note ## L_+|M-1>=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}|M> ##.

This is true. However, I am still wondering about my original question. When you "undo" the square of a modulus, it seems reasonable to me that you would have a family of solutions as detailed above. Is this true?

Thanks,
KQ6UP
 
kq6up said:
This is true. However, I am still wondering about my original question. When you "undo" the square of a modulus, it seems reasonable to me that you would have a family of solutions as detailed above. Is this true?

Thanks,
KQ6UP
Your "c" above is always positive. I think one question you are asking is might these matrix elements always contain an arbitrary phase factor of the form ## exp(i \phi) ##, and I think the answer to this is yes.
 
Just confirming what Charles has said above, one can always replace ##c## with ##ce^{i\phi}## as this will only impose a constant phase factor on the state. It's chosen as real positive just a matter of convention, pretty much the same case as the constants ##\sqrt{n+1}## and ##\sqrt{n}## in the raising and lowering operators in harmonic oscillator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kq6up, Charles Link and bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
989
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K