Phased array antenna vs single antenna for remote sensing.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the advantages of phased array antennas over single antennas for remote sensing applications, specifically in the context of the Cosmic-1 and Cosmic-2 satellites. Phased array antennas enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, particularly in lower tropospheric observations, due to their high antenna gain and steerability. The transition from single antennas to phased arrays in the Cosmic-2 satellites indicates a shift towards more advanced technology, allowing for improved performance in radio occultation exercises. Key factors in antenna design, including simplicity and technological advancements, play a crucial role in this evolution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of phased array antenna technology
  • Knowledge of radio occultation techniques
  • Familiarity with satellite communication systems
  • Basic principles of antenna gain and beam steering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design principles of phased array antennas
  • Explore the impact of antenna gain on signal quality in remote sensing
  • Learn about the advancements in satellite communication technology
  • Investigate the applications of steerable antennas in various fields
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, satellite communication specialists, and researchers in remote sensing who are interested in the technical advancements and performance improvements offered by phased array antennas.

Tone L
Messages
72
Reaction score
7
My question stems from the Cosmic-1 satellites using single antennas for radio occultation and the cosmic-2 sats that will use a phased array antenna.

I've done a fair amount of research in regards to the phased array antenna. Overall it seems to improve the signal to noise ratio when making observations in the lower troposphere (high antenna gain).

I have a weak understanding of antennas (not an engineer). So does anyone else know any other advantages to a phased array antenna in comparison to single array.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have to give the stock answer; "It all depends".
There are so many factors in antenna design and even more when it is to be mounted on a satellite.
There is a lot to be said for keeping things simple when possible. Presumably the occultation exercise can benefit from a steerable antenna and the available technology would probably be more advanced for the second satellite. So I would guess that the better performance would always have been preferred but was not available for the first mission.
PS Steerable would mean that a narrower beam could be used - hence the gain would be higher.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K