PhD Astrophysics, Europe or USA?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing a PhD in Astrophysics in Europe versus the USA. Sebastian, a recent physics graduate from the University of Antioquia, Colombia, highlights that US PhDs typically last five years and offer better job prospects, particularly in academia, but are harder to fund. Conversely, European PhDs generally last three years, have more accessible scholarships, and are perceived as equally reputable, although job opportunities post-graduation may be limited. Participants emphasize the importance of considering university productivity and expert availability in the chosen research field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PhD program structures in Astrophysics
  • Familiarity with scholarship and funding opportunities in academia
  • Knowledge of job market trends for astrophysicists in Europe and the USA
  • Awareness of the differences in educational systems between Europe and the USA
NEXT STEPS
  • Research PhD programs in Astrophysics at top universities like Harvard, Princeton, and institutions in Europe
  • Explore scholarship opportunities for PhD candidates in Europe, particularly in Germany
  • Investigate post-doctoral opportunities in the USA for graduates from European PhD programs
  • Analyze job market statistics for astrophysics graduates in both Europe and the USA
USEFUL FOR

Prospective PhD candidates in Astrophysics, academic advisors, and individuals considering international education options in the field of physics.

SebastianB
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

This is my first post! :)

I want to ask you about the pros and cons of doing a PhD in Astrophysics in Europe or USA.

First, I'm going to talk about my current situation. I got my bachelor's degree in physics two months ago, at University of Antioquia, Colombia. I have some experience in researching (presentations, posters, research groups, two ApJ papers, ...), so according to my former Professors it shouldn't be that hard to get admitted in different Universities and I hope it's true!

Some of my former Professors have told me about the pros and cons of each option. According to them, with a PhD in USA I could get a job easily (academic or non-academic job, most of us know about the increasing difficulty to get academic jobs), this is why the USA Universities have better international ranks, more funds, etc. And to be honest, a PhD degree in Harvard, Princeton, Berkeley, bla bla bla, sounds really good :). The main issues with this option are: the PhDs are generally of 5 years!, and the scholarships (really fellowships) are ... scarce, so to speak.

Now, respect to Europe and according to them again, job options are very scarce, inclusively non-academic jobs and probably I must return to Colombia, where a PhD in Astrophysics doesn't help to get non-academic jobs and the academic ones are scarce too. On the other hand, the scholarships use to be much better, and the PhD are generally of 3 years. For example, more specifically, is it a better option doing a PhD in 3 years and after 2 years of pos-doc in USA than a PhD in 5 years (USA)?

So, with all of this in mind and appealing to your experience, what is "the best" option? I know that I must consider things like, what is the more productive University in my research field? Or where are the experts on the field? But I'm really confused and I must decide relatively quickly in order to start to do all the admission procedures. So, please just comment your opinion, I'll really appreciate it!

With my best regards!

Sebastian.

Pd: Sorry for my English.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
and the PhD are generally of 3 years
That is true, but they usually require a master degree. Add both, and you are at 5 years again.
Europe can be cheaper - the master degree does not cost much (~400-1500 Euro/year in Germany), and PhD positions are paid (enough to live from it). I don't think a PhD in Europe is worse than a PhD in the US.
 
Thanks for your answer!

mfb said:
... but they usually require a master degree.

That's true, but here in my local University, undergraduate physics takes 5 year unfortunately, so we must take courses relatively advanced (and sometimes useless), because of that some graduates students have achieved to get admitted in PhD programs in Europe directly.

mfb said:
I don't think a PhD in Europe is worse than a PhD in the US.

I don't think that either, inclusively in Europe are the most prominent experts in my research field! My only consideration about US is due to job opportunities, otherwise, I'd choose Europe without giving it a second thought.

Regards.
 
Well, you can get a job in the US with a PhD from Europe, too (and vice versa).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K