PhD Qualifying Exam Samples | Bob Guercio

  • Context: Testing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Wannabeagenius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exams Ph.d
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around obtaining samples of Ph.D. qualifying exams in physics, with participants sharing resources, personal experiences, and recommendations for study materials. The scope includes practical advice for exam preparation and reflections on the effectiveness of various resources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Bob Guercio inquires about sources for Ph.D. qualifying exam samples.
  • One participant mentions that the University of Cincinnati has a collection of their Physics Ph.D. qualifiers available online.
  • Another participant notes that each physics department has unique qualifying exams that may focus on specific research areas, suggesting contacting the department for past exams as a more effective study method.
  • Several participants recommend a series of books titled "Problems and Solutions in Classical Mechanics" and "Problems and Solutions in Statistical Mechanics," stating that these contain problems from qualifying exams and can be useful for practice, despite some errors in solutions.
  • One participant reflects on the utility of these books for learning and preparing for exams, while also noting their limitations as study guides without a typical physics text context.
  • Another participant shares their experience of preparing for their quals by solving recent exams from their own school, emphasizing the importance of understanding what professors typically ask.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the effectiveness of a book compared to classroom instruction, with participants suggesting that learning styles may influence outcomes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the best methods for preparing for qualifying exams, with no consensus on a single approach. Some emphasize the importance of departmental resources, while others advocate for specific books or personal study methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the effectiveness of study materials may vary based on individual learning styles and the specific content of qualifying exams across different departments.

Wannabeagenius
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

Does anyone know where I can get samples of Ph.D qualifying exams.

Thanks in advance,

Bob Guercio
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From a specific school?If not, I know that the University of Cincinnati has many of their Physics Ph.D. qualifiers on file:

http://homepages.uc.edu/physics/grad/phdProblems.html
 
I'm not sure how much it would help you. Each physics department has its own quals. Sometimes they can be based on research areas specific to the department. For example, my department has active research in condensed matter, high energy, nuclear physics, and astrophysics. So our qualifier has questions on all four of these research topics.

If you're preparing for a qualifier, then my guess is that you've been accepted into a graduate program. Rather than looking for qual problems on the Internet, it would help you significantly more if you called the office of the department where you'll be attending, and ask for old copies of their qualifiers. My department has CDs with old qualifiers dating back to 1981, and this is the department-approved way of studying for the qual. Yours should have something similar.
 
There is a line of books: Problems and Solutions in Classical Mechanics. . .. Problems and Solutions in Statistical Mechanics. . . and so on. The problems are taken straight from PhD qualifying exams and are really excellent references. They have a few errors in the solutions here and there, but that should be part of the fun, finding them. I actually use them to study for regular classes, as I think they provide a great background.

On the downside, they are pretty expensive.
 
Locrian said:
There is a line of books: Problems and Solutions in Classical Mechanics. . .. Problems and Solutions in Statistical Mechanics. . . and so on. The problems are taken straight from PhD qualifying exams and are really excellent references. They have a few errors in the solutions here and there, but that should be part of the fun, finding them. I actually use them to study for regular classes, as I think they provide a great background.

On the downside, they are pretty expensive.

I used these to pass my quals. I found them useful to get new problems to solve and to learn what kind of problems one is likely to see. I then let friends use them to pass their quals. These books are just tons of problems and solutions. Some very bad solutions. There is no "typical" physics text discussing concepts or different solution methods. So unless you are rehearsed in the background, I don't think they are useful study guides. But if you are looking to find new problems to solve. Or find out what kind of problems you find on Quals, then these would be useful.

One thing you could do is get a group of friends- each one buys a book and you guys swap them around to study.
 
Last edited:
Hmm. . . after reading your response Norman, I wonder about something - is the fact that I learned more statistical mechanics from the book Problems and Solutions in Statistical Mechanics than I did in the class a good sign for the book, or a bad sign for the professor?
 
I prepared for my quals by solving recent exams from my own school. That's really the only way to do it, IMO. Qualifying exams are wide open with regards to content, and the only way to really narrow it down is to get to know what each professor likes to ask. I was lucky in that the same professors who taught the core courses also wrote the qualifier.
 
Locrian said:
Hmm. . . after reading your response Norman, I wonder about something - is the fact that I learned more statistical mechanics from the book Problems and Solutions in Statistical Mechanics than I did in the class a good sign for the book, or a bad sign for the professor?

Maybe a little of both? (Joking)

Sometimes to learn something you just need to crank on it for a long time with repetition and practice. All depends on your learning style and the subject. I wouldn't read too much into the professor or the book from one instance. It worked for you and that is great!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K