Phonons and classical non-locality?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of phonons as collective excitations in quantum mechanics (QM) and their potential connection to classical non-locality. Phonons, akin to quantized sound waves, can exhibit entanglement similar to photons, suggesting that quantum entanglement may occur at macroscopic scales. The conversation references a paper from IOPscience that explores the coherence of phonons across distances, raising questions about the implications for quantum behavior in non-equilibrium systems and material elasticity. The discussion highlights the complexities of measuring quantum states and the challenges of observing quantum phenomena outside controlled environments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with phonons and their role in solid-state physics
  • Knowledge of quantum entanglement and its implications
  • Basic grasp of non-equilibrium thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of phonons in material elasticity and quantum chemistry
  • Study the principles of quantum entanglement in macroscopic systems
  • Examine the implications of non-locality in quantum mechanics
  • Explore experimental techniques for observing quantum phenomena outside laboratory settings
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and classical physics, particularly in the context of phonons and entanglement.

Jimster41
Gold Member
Messages
782
Reaction score
83
I just discovered the concept of phonons and the story of Brian Josephson (from reading "Sync" by Steven Strogatz).

What the h...?

So Phonon's are collective excitations of classical stuff made from QM ensembles, excitations made possible by the QM properties of the ensemble members? Are phonons not examples of non-local entanglement at classical scales?

Can an ensemble of phonons have "collective excitations"?

Does phonon evolution require collapse-like measurements, or preclude them, or i don't know, somehow absorb or erase them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phonons are quantized sound waves just like photons are quantized light waves.

Just as pairs or groups of photons can be entangled with one another, so can pairs/groups of phonons.

In principle. it is definitely possible to have quantum entanglement occur at the macroscopic scale.
See for example:
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/442/1/012004

We don't necessarily see it all the time because quantum behavior is usually hard to observe outside the laboratory, where we can isolate the object we're looking at from outside disturbances.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jimster41
Very readable paper. And an elegant experiment. I also liked the paragraph at the end about the back propagation of the measurement projection to avoid the retro-causality GR-frame issue. I finally sort of got that argument. If I understand correctly the idea is that there is literally nothing available inside the quantum, meaning inside the interval between the detector d and the moment of scattering. Therefore all "projections of measurement" relate to the state at the moment of scattering.

That said, the non-local (space-like) coherence of the phonon across the two diamonds is plenty bizzare? That's what that is right?

The part I just can't shake is how a system going from state to state in the non-equilibrium case doesn't play some version of this same game. The experiment is about a controlled exposure of the phenomenon through an extraordinary manipulation of entropy and disequilibrium, but doesn't the result potentially show a fundamental mechanism of everyday quantum chemistry? Are phonons a part of the understanding of microscopic material elasticity? I feel like the gap between QM and chemistry is an absolute blank, in my mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
508
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K