Docscientist
- 101
- 11
When we shine a light of particular color on a metal,it expells the free electrons present in the metal.In that case,doesn't the metal get ionized ?
The discussion revolves around the photoelectric effect and its implications for the ionization of metals when exposed to light. Participants explore the nature of free electrons in metals and the concept of ionization in this context.
Participants express differing views on whether the loss of electrons in the context of the photoelectric effect should be classified as ionization. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations of the terms involved.
There are limitations in the definitions of ionization and delocalization as applied to metals, and the discussion does not resolve the implications of these terms in the context of the photoelectric effect.
Can you elaborate more on that ? And you say they "miss a piece of electron", why can't that be called ionisation ?Borek said:There are no isolated, charged atoms, rather every single atom misses a piece of an electron.
In a metal, the outermost electrons are delocalised rather than bound to an individual atom, so no single metal atom loses an electron.Docscientist said:Can you elaborate more on that ? And you say they "miss a piece of electron", why can't that be called ionisation ?
What do you mean by delocalised ?Vagn said:In a metal, the outermost electrons are delocalised rather than bound to an individual atom, so no single metal atom loses an electron.
Have you tried the wikipoedia page on delocalized electrons?Docscientist said:What do you mean by delocalised ?
I just went through the page.I still can't get it.Even if it is delocalized,it is still a free electron that once belonged to the metal's atoms.So any way there is a losing that takes place.In that case,considering the metal to be ionized should be right,isn't it ?Vagn said:Have you tried the wikipoedia page on delocalized electrons?
Docscientist said:I just went through the page.I still can't get it.Even if it is delocalized,it is still a free electron that once belonged to the metal's atoms.So any way there is a losing that takes place.In that case,considering the metal to be ionized should be right,isn't it ?