Photoelectric efffect question

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter NMphoton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photoelectric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between maximum electric current and light intensity in photoelectric effect scenarios is defined by quantum efficiency (QE). In photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), a theoretical maximum QE of 1 indicates that 6.25 x 1018 photons per second can produce 1 amp of photoelectrons. Actual PMTs have demonstrated a QE exceeding 50% at a wavelength of 4000 Angstroms, showcasing their efficiency in converting light into electric current.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of photoelectric effect principles
  • Familiarity with photomultiplier tubes (PMTs)
  • Knowledge of quantum efficiency (QE) concepts
  • Basic grasp of photon and electron interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational principles of photomultiplier tubes (PMTs)
  • Study the calculation of quantum efficiency (QE) in photonic devices
  • Explore the effects of light intensity on photoelectron emission
  • Investigate the applications of PMTs in scientific instrumentation
USEFUL FOR

Students, researchers, and professionals in physics and engineering fields, particularly those focused on photonics and electronic detection systems.

NMphoton
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey there,
I know this may seem like a stupid question but what is the relationship between the maximum electric current and the intensity of light?

:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have a thin surface emitting photoelectrons (semitransparent film on the back side of a clear glass window), and a large electric field perpendicular to the surface, like in photomultipliers PMTs), the theoretical maximum quantum efficiency (QE) is 1. In this case, 6.25 x 10^18 photons per sec produces 1 amp of photoelectrons. In actual cases, PMTs have exceeded a QE of 50% at 4000 Angstroms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K