High School Photon, string theory string, E&M field

Click For Summary
Electric and magnetic fields can be associated with the vibrating strings representing photons in string theory, similar to quantum electrodynamics. In this framework, charged particles emit and absorb virtual photons, which correspond to excitations of the electromagnetic field. A photon in string theory is represented by a specific type of string, while electromagnetically charged strings can emit photon strings. The interaction between these strings and branes leads to the generation of electric fields through the density of virtual photon strings. This model aligns with established equations like the Born-Infeld equation, which connects to Maxwell's equations at low energies.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Is it possible to associate electric and magnetic fields with the vibrating string that is thought to represent a photon in string theory?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It works the same as in quantum electrodynamics. There, if you have some configuration of charged particles (e.g. electrons and protons), they will be emitting and absorbing virtual photons, or causing excitations of modes of the electromagnetic field - in a quantum field theory, virtual particles and field mode excitations are just two ways of talking about the same thing - and saying that a point in space has a certain density of virtual photons, or a certain average level of field activity, gives you the electric and/or magnetic field strengths at that point, and therefore also gives you the force that will be experienced by a charged object at that point.

In a string model of physics, a photon will correspond to a particular type of string, like an open string with both ends attached to a particular brane; and for another type of string to count as electromagnetically charged, it has to be capable of emitting the photon type of string. So that could be an open string with one end attached to the "electromagnetism brane", and the other end attached to a different brane, like the "electron flavor brane". That would be an electron type of string, and if the end of that string attached to the "electromagnetism brane" budded off a new string which was attached at both ends to the "electromagnetism brane", that would be an electron-string emitting a photon-string.

Once you have that, everything works as before. The electron-string stretches between the electromagnetism brane and the electron flavor brane, and its electrostatic field is a density of virtual photon-strings that it produces in the electromagnetism brane, and which emanate from the point where the electron-string is attached. In fact, the photon-strings actually are quantized vibrations of the electromagnetism brane. The brane's vibrations are described by the Born-Infeld equation, which is an old modification of electrodynamics that long predates string theory, and which reduces to Maxwell's equations at low energies.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy and Spinnor
Thank you Mitchell for both your replies!
 
mitchell porter said:
field mode excitations

which field? real electron field or real photon field. virtual photons do not have fields of their own, correct?
 
Those questions are very confusing. Perhaps I should have said:

"they will be emitting and absorbing virtual photons, or causing VIRTUAL excitations of modes of the electromagnetic field - in a quantum field theory, virtual particles and VIRTUAL field mode excitations are just two ways of talking about the same thing"
 
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K