Physical basis for high-bypass turbofans

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of turbofans and their efficiency compared to turbojets. It is explained that a bypass stage can increase efficiency by removing some of the jet's velocity and using it to speed up the slower moving inlet air. This results in a higher net impulse on the air and therefore more thrust for the same amount of fuel. The conversation also mentions the importance of understanding the Thrust equation and Specific thrust in designing turbofan engines. Overall, the conversation provides a thorough explanation of the concept of bypass turbofan engines and their benefits.
  • #1
mikeph
1,235
18
Hi,

Can someone double check I understand this correctly?

The turbofan has lower specific fuel consumption because a gas's momentum is proportional to its velocity, whereas a gas's kinetic energy is proportional to its squared velocity. Therefore a turbojet can be made more efficient by adding a bypass stage, which effectively removes some of the jet's velocity (via a turbine powering the fan), removing some of the momentum (and therefore thrust), but removing also a much higher proportion of kinetic energy. If this kinetic energy powers the front fan, then it can be added to the slower moving inlet air, which increases its speed and therefore the bypass air gains disproportionally more backwards momentum than was lose at the jet. The net impulse on the air is therefore higher for a given amount of fuel.

Is this correct? It's a "slow the fast thing down and use the energy to speed the slow thing up" idea?

Do pressure ratios come into it as well?

Cheers.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #3
mikeph said:
...because momentum is proportional to velocity, whereas kinetic energy is proportional to squared velocity.

Agreed. Accelerate much air a bit consumes less than accelerate little air a lot.

Hence by-pass. If the aeroplane speed allows it, prefer even wider turboprops. And for a helicopter, take a huge rotor.
 
  • #4
Your statement describing that the kinetic energy is added to the incoming air thereby speeding it up is wrong...
 
  • #5
In order to understand the need of bypass turbofan engine you have to first of all understand the Thrust equation and the term Specific thrust..For a same amount of thrust at same inlet velocity condition if u design a turbojet and turbofan engine...
F=mair(Vj-Vi)
Turbojet concentrates more on the (Vj-Vi) on the thrust equation term.But to produce same amount of the thrust turbofan increases the mair entering the engine..turbofan accomplishes this by having a fan infront of it,more work is extracted from the gas with the help of the turbine to drive the fan.By increasing the mass flow rate rather concentrating on the (Vj-Vi),specific thrust decreases which decreases SFC(specific fuel consumption)...
 
  • #6
Anish Aravinth said:
Your statement describing that the kinetic energy is added to the incoming air thereby speeding it up is wrong...

Not at all - in fact, it's exactly correct. A high-bypass turbofan (and a turboprop for that matter) remove kinetic and thermal energy from the core flow, and then use the extracted energy to increase the kinetic energy of a much larger volume of air. As stated in the OP, this allows for a much larger momentum flux for the same power output, and thus, more thrust for the same fuel consumption.
 

1. What is the physical basis for high-bypass turbofans?

The physical basis for high-bypass turbofans is the principle of accelerated air flow through the engine, resulting in higher thrust and efficiency. This is achieved by using a large fan at the front of the engine to draw in and compress a large amount of air, which is then mixed with fuel and ignited in the combustion chamber. The resulting hot gases are then accelerated through a series of turbine blades, which in turn drive the fan and compressor. This high-bypass design allows for a greater amount of air to bypass the engine core, producing more thrust with less fuel consumption compared to traditional low-bypass turbofan engines.

2. How does the high-bypass ratio affect engine performance?

The high-bypass ratio, which is the ratio of air that bypasses the engine core compared to the amount that passes through it, directly affects the engine's performance. A higher bypass ratio means more air is being accelerated by the fan, resulting in higher thrust and efficiency. This allows for higher takeoff weights, longer range, and better fuel economy compared to low-bypass engines.

3. What materials are used in high-bypass turbofans?

High-bypass turbofans use a variety of materials, including lightweight alloys such as titanium and composites, to withstand the high temperatures and pressures within the engine. These materials must also be able to endure the stresses of rapid acceleration and deceleration during operation. In addition, coatings and thermal barrier coatings are applied to certain components to further protect them from heat and wear.

4. How do high-bypass turbofans reduce engine noise?

High-bypass turbofans are designed to reduce engine noise, particularly during takeoff and landing, by directing a larger portion of air through the fan and bypassing the engine core. This reduces the noise generated by the engine's high-velocity exhaust gases. Additionally, advanced noise reduction technologies such as acoustic liners and chevrons on the engine's exhaust nozzle further decrease noise levels.

5. What are the advantages of high-bypass turbofans over other engine designs?

Compared to other engine designs, high-bypass turbofans offer several advantages. These include higher thrust and efficiency, lower fuel consumption, longer range, and reduced noise levels. Additionally, the simpler design of high-bypass engines allows for easier maintenance and lower operating costs. These factors make high-bypass turbofans the preferred choice for most commercial and military aircraft.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
850
Replies
4
Views
703
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
4
Replies
139
Views
25K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
6
Views
653
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top