Physical Chemistry vs. Chemical Physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Physical chemistry and chemical physics are distinct disciplines primarily differentiated by their perspectives rather than the scale of analysis. Chemical physics focuses on the behavior of individual molecules and atoms, often employing quantum mechanics and techniques like density functional theory. In contrast, physical chemistry emphasizes macroscopic properties, such as bulk thermodynamics and reaction kinetics. While methods and results may overlap, the interpretations and foundational viewpoints diverge significantly between the two fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with density functional theory (DFT)
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic properties
  • Basic concepts of reaction kinetics and statistical thermodynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore quantum mechanics applications in chemical physics
  • Study density functional theory (DFT) in detail
  • Investigate macroscopic thermodynamic properties in physical chemistry
  • Learn about the role of statistical thermodynamics in both disciplines
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in chemistry and physics, particularly those seeking to clarify the distinctions between physical chemistry and chemical physics, will benefit from this discussion.

NewWorldSamurai
I've yet to clearly understand the difference between these two disciplines, and I was wondering if anyone else had any insights. I first thought they were one and the same, but they are certainly used as different terms in most universities. I've come to understand it as a difference of scales. When one is performing analyses on only a few molecules or atoms, such as electronic or molecular structure calculations and density functional theory calculations, I view that as chemical physics (particularly if quantum mechanics is used). On a more macroscopic scale where one is looking at bulk thermodynamic properties I view that as physical chemistry. Reaction kinetics and statistical thermodynamics are kind of in the middle of these two. That's just my guess though. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A chemical physicist is a physicist first and a bad chemist second; a physical chemist is a chemist first and a lousy physicist second. The scale of problems/sizes of systems being studied/analyzed has very little to do with the distinction --- p-chem is physics from a chemist's viewpoint, and chemphys is chemistry from a physicist's viewpoint. The problems can be identical, the methods can be identical, and the results can be identical, but the interpretations seldom present even a superficial resemblance.
 
excellent point. i agree totally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
815
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K