Physical interpretation of a Hamiltonian with a constraint

In summary, the discussion on the physical interpretation of imposing a constraint on a Hamiltonian, specifically Tr(\hat H^2)=2\omega ^2, remains unclear without providing a physical context. The constraint could suggest a two-state system with equal energy levels, but without additional information, it is difficult to determine the exact interpretation. Additionally, it is important to note that for any operator, the trace is equal to the sum of the eigenvalues, which could potentially provide more insight into the situation.
  • #1
Alex Cros
28
1
Dear physics forums,

What is the physical interpretation of imposing the following constrain on a Hamiltonian:
[tex] Tr(\hat H^2)=2\omega ^2 [/tex]
where [itex]\omega[/itex] is a given constant. I am not very familiar with why is the trace of the hamiltonian there.

Thanks in advance,
Alex
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The physical interpretation requires a physical context, and you didn't explain the physical context. At the very least, you should provide the reference in which this constraint is introduced.
 
  • Like
Likes Orodruin
  • #3
Without the context, I would guess that the Hamiltonian describes a two-state system (hence the factor 2) both of which have the same energy ##\omega##.
 
  • #4
Demystifier said:
Without the context, I would guess that the Hamiltonian describes a two-state system (hence the factor 2) both of which have the same energy ##\omega##.

In case the OP didn't know this already---for any operator, the trace is equal to the sum of the eigenvalues. So if the trace of [itex]H^2[/itex] is [itex]2\omega^2[/itex], then it means that the energy eigenvalues are such that [itex]E_1^2 + E_2^2 + ... = 2\omega^2[/itex]. Demystifier's example is one of the simplest: [itex]E_1 = E_2 = \omega[/itex]. Or it could be [itex]E_1 = \omega, E_2 = -\omega[/itex]. Or it could be [itex]E_1 = \omega, E_2 = \omega/\sqrt{2}, E_3 = \omega/\sqrt{4}, E_4 = \omega/\sqrt{8} ...[/itex]

The sum of the eigenvalues doesn't seem to me to be a "constraint" on the Hamiltonian, it's just a fact about it.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK

1. What is a Hamiltonian with a constraint?

A Hamiltonian with a constraint is a mathematical representation of a physical system that takes into account both the energy of the system and any constraints or limitations that may affect its behavior.

2. How is a Hamiltonian with a constraint used in physics?

In physics, a Hamiltonian with a constraint is used to describe the motion and behavior of a physical system, taking into account both the forces acting on the system and any constraints or limitations that may affect its movement.

3. What is the significance of a constraint in a Hamiltonian?

A constraint in a Hamiltonian is significant because it represents a physical limitation or boundary that affects the behavior of the system. It can also provide insight into the underlying structure and dynamics of the system.

4. Can a Hamiltonian with a constraint be solved analytically?

In most cases, a Hamiltonian with a constraint cannot be solved analytically, meaning there is no exact mathematical solution. Instead, numerical methods and approximations are often used to study the behavior of the system.

5. How does a constraint affect the energy of a system in a Hamiltonian?

A constraint affects the energy of a system in a Hamiltonian by limiting the possible values of energy that the system can have. This can lead to a more complex energy landscape and affect the overall dynamics of the system.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
11
Replies
370
Views
9K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
2
Views
608
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
247
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
247
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
6
Replies
179
Views
11K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
8
Views
431
Back
Top