Physics and Mathematics involved in Engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the relationship between physics, mathematics, and engineering, particularly in the context of pursuing a career in Aerospace Engineering. Participants share their experiences and insights regarding the balance of theoretical knowledge and practical application in engineering fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that engineering might be perceived as merely being "highly paid mechanics," seeking clarification on the nature of Aerospace Engineering.
  • Another participant asserts that engineers spend most of their time on computers or theoretical work rather than in labs, countering the mechanic comparison.
  • A third participant notes a significant variation in how much math and physics engineering students engage with, highlighting that some focus on practical design while others delve deeper into theoretical aspects.
  • One participant mentions opportunities for using advanced math and physics in aerospace engineering and suggests considering a minor in Applied Math or Physics for those interested in theory.
  • Another participant shares their experience of working with mechanical engineers in research roles, emphasizing the scientific rigor involved in certain engineering specializations, particularly in fluid dynamics and computational mechanics.
  • A freshman participant indicates their interest in both theoretical and engineering aspects, mentioning a minor in astrophysics and acknowledging their newness to the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there is a wide range of experiences and interests within engineering, particularly regarding the use of math and physics. However, there is no consensus on the perception of engineering as merely mechanical work versus a more theoretical pursuit.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about their future paths in engineering and the extent to which they will engage with theoretical versus practical work. The discussion reflects varying personal interests and educational backgrounds among participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering a career in engineering, particularly Aerospace Engineering, as well as those interested in the interplay between theoretical and practical applications in STEM fields.

Dr_Kesha_PHD
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I decided to post a new thread for this. I saw the pinned thread about going into Engineering but my specific questions were not answered in that thread.

I am going into Aerospace Engineering this summer. I am doing it because I love Physics, like Math, and am very interested in Spacecraft, defense, aircraft, etc.

I have been told that Engineering is a lot of Physics and Math which is what I want to do. But it sometimes seems like they are just highly paid mechanics. I really hope this is not true. I don't mind doing hands-on work. I actually want to do some hands-on work but I want to mostly be dealing with problem solving using math and physics.

I am just looking for someone to weigh in on this and clear up my confusion. Just tell me what it is all about (Aerospace specifically.)

Basically, I would like some insight. Do you think I am going into Aerospace Engineering for the right reasons? Or is it not for me? I know that every individual job will be slightly different but I want to know what an average career is like.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Engineers are not highly paid mechanics. I rarely go into the lab. The vast majority of my time is spent working on the computer or thinking.

I'm guessing you are just starting your education. You don't know yet if engineering is for you or what branch you will enjoy most. Try it out, you have plenty of time.
 
I'm only just finishing third-year electrical engineering, so take this with a grain of salt, but I find that there's a huge range in terms of how much math/physics engineering students use. Some people in my class don't like theoretical stuff, and just get through the bare minimum amount of theory so that they can work on the design problems they're interested in. Then there are people like me who like the engineering aspects, but who also enjoy learning the theory behind it, and so they go deeper into the math/physics side of things. What I think you'll find is that there's plenty of opportunity to use a lot of math and physics, but a lot of your peers will steer clear of it because that's not where their interests are.

In short, I think you should definitely give it a try. If you're interested in theory, I'm sure there are a ton of interesting and challenging math/physics problems in aerospace engineering for you to pursue. If you find yourself still wanting more theory, you might even consider a minor in Applied Math or Physics to help supplement your background knowledge.
 
I agree, a huge range exist. There are many ME's employed as research scientist at national labs for example. I was at Ames National lab last summer where my mentor, an ME, was a fluid dynamicist. Of course this is basically AE. Fluids/Thermal Sciences and Computational Mechanics as GRADUATE specializations in ME are as "scientific" as any other graduate science program. You could make the case that the math involved in those specializations is among the most intense in the natural/applied sciences. Lots of PDE's and tensors floating around. I would certainly not consider any engineer a mechanic, LoL... don't you already have a Phd anyway?
 
Yeah I am really am interested in the theory side of it but also the engineering side. I am also minoring in astrophysics. But as you can tell, I'm a freshman so I'm extremely new to the field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K