Physics + CE masters versus CE undergrad

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison between pursuing a master's degree in physics combined with computer engineering (CE) versus an undergraduate degree in computer engineering, particularly in the context of employment opportunities in tech companies like Apple, Intel, and AMD. Participants explore the implications of their educational backgrounds on job prospects, research opportunities, and the transition between fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how a physics+CE master's degree compares to a CE undergraduate degree in terms of job prospects at tech companies, expressing concern about being overlooked for positions.
  • Another participant suggests that while a master's degree is generally advantageous, practical experience may outweigh educational qualifications, particularly if an undergraduate in CE has more experience.
  • Some participants note that tech companies often prefer candidates with a CE undergraduate degree, especially if they are pursuing a master's in CE, over those with a physics background.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential need to complete additional undergraduate courses if transitioning from physics to engineering, particularly for those who feel underprepared for master's-level coursework.
  • Participants discuss the presence of research labs at companies like Intel and AMD that employ physics PhDs, indicating that R&D roles exist but may be competitive.
  • One participant shares their experience of being accepted into a CE master's program despite a physics background, highlighting the possibility of taking prerequisite courses to bridge knowledge gaps.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the value of a physics+CE master's versus a CE undergraduate degree, with no clear consensus on which path is more advantageous for employment in tech companies. Concerns about preparation for master's programs and the competitiveness of research roles are also discussed, indicating ongoing uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the importance of practical experience and specific coursework in determining job readiness, while others highlight the competitive nature of research positions in tech companies. The discussion reflects varying levels of preparedness and the potential need for additional coursework when transitioning fields.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a transition from physics to computer engineering, those exploring master's programs in CE, and individuals interested in research opportunities in tech companies may find this discussion relevant.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
How do these two compare to a tech (Apple, ARM, RIM, Asustek, etc) company? I ask this because I lost interest in doing computer engineering however working at RIM for coop has sparked my interest again. Where would I fit coming back to this company with a physics+CE masters? Would the engineer undergrads get snapped up long before me? It seems like a masters can't fully full the void between physics and computer engineering.

Do most of these companies have (large) research groups that would welcome materials-like research for, say, chips or HDDs?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cscott said:
How do these two compare to a tech (Apple, ARM, RIM, Asustek, etc) company? I ask this because I lost interest in doing computer engineering however working at RIM for coop has sparked my interest again. Where would I fit coming back to this company with a physics+CE masters? Would the engineer undergrads get snapped up long before me? It seems like a masters can't fully full the void between physics and computer engineering.

Do most of these companies have (large) research groups that would welcome materials-like research for, say, chips or HDDs?

Thanks.

A masters would be better than an undergrad, nonetheless. An undergrad CE would take the job over a masters CE if he has more experience. An employer should know that graduate level CE courses are more in-depth and have more value than undergrad CE courses. The first 2 years you spend at universities are general ed classes that have nothing to do with your major coursework.

I have always thought that your bachelor's degree becomes almost negligible when you have your masters.
 
I agree with fizziks, the only issue your going to run up against is if you have a Comp Eng undergrad who is going to get his Masters (which like 90% of Comp Eng) are probably doing because places like intel/amd/whoever won't let you touch hardware design unless you have a minimum of a masters. They will most likely pick the comp eng under with a masters in ce over a physics under with a masters in CE. But you can still find a job I'm sure.
 
Thanks. Your comments have been helpful.

I guess my biggest issue is only being in second year and I don't quite know exactly what I want to do, just a few general areas.

Do intel/amd/etc have research labs with physics PhD's? If so, what kind of research is done?

I guess my worst fear is definitely wanting to make the switch to engineering and having to make up first year courses.

One last question: If you feel you're under prepared for masters-level courses do places often let you take a term of undergrad courses or should this be done at the end of your undergrad degree, before even applying for a masters? Here I'm talking about someone changing their field 'slightly', i.e. physics undergrad then CE masters or engineering then physics PhD...

I do know an engineer going for his PhD in physics... he was the TA for one of my first year labs.
 
Last edited:
Yes they have labs with physics PhDs. Even IBM. R&D is needed, especially when you're working on the next generation technology. It will be highly competitive though.
 
cscott said:
Thanks. Your comments have been helpful.

I guess my biggest issue is only being in second year and I don't quite know exactly what I want to do, just a few general areas.

Do intel/amd/etc have research labs with physics PhD's? If so, what kind of research is done?

I guess my worst fear is definitely wanted to make the switch to engineering and having to make up first year courses.

One last question: If you feel you're under prepared for masters-level courses do places often let you take a term of undergrad courses or should this be done at the end of your undergrad degree, before even applying for a masters?

They do have physicists with PhDs in their labs for research and development. But they're not very easy to get nor is a PhD in physics. But the job outlook seems to be much better for a Masters in CE than a PhD physicist. In the long run, you have to look at the bills :frown:. I'm starting to realize that since I'm off to my own now. You got to work no matter what to self-sustain yourself.

I got into the CE masters program at a local state school here, even though I was a physics major with little CE background. ATM, I'm taking enrolled as a non-degree student taking the important pre-reqs for a CE (mainly computer architecture, software engineering, and microprocessors). Some schools will let you in with the exception that you taken certain pre-reqs.
 
I think if I went to UWaterloo for my Masters (I'm doing my undergrad physics here, at UW) they'd let me in with little missing prereqs so long as I stress my physics degree in EM theory, electronics and communications where I can.

I still love the physics courses :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K