Physics education PhD then MSc Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of pursuing a PhD in Physics Education for future academic and research opportunities. It is established that a PhD in Physics Education may limit career prospects outside of teaching and does not provide adequate training for research in specialized fields such as condensed matter physics. Participants emphasize that a follow-on MSc in Theoretical Physics or Condensed Matter may not compensate for the lack of technical research experience gained during a traditional PhD in Physics. The structure of the PhD program, particularly its interdisciplinary nature, significantly influences the ability to transition into different research areas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PhD program structures in academia
  • Familiarity with research areas in physics, particularly condensed matter physics
  • Knowledge of the differences between education-focused and research-focused PhD programs
  • Awareness of the requirements for university-level lecturing positions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the structure and requirements of PhD programs in Physics Education
  • Explore the curriculum and research opportunities in MSc programs in Theoretical Physics
  • Investigate the career trajectories of individuals with a PhD in Physics Education
  • Learn about the qualifications needed for university-level teaching in physics-related fields
USEFUL FOR

Secondary school physics teachers, prospective PhD candidates in education, and individuals interested in transitioning to research roles in physics.

dwd40physics
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am currently a physics teacher at secondary school level (high school). I have been offered to do a PhD in physics education in an area of research that interests me and relates to physics teaching. I am aware that physics education PhDs might not open up as many career opportunities outside of teaching however I wasn't sure if this PhD would enable me to lecture at university level later on ?

While teaching physics has been and still is of great interest to me I would like to at some point to pursue own intellectual interests in physics research - if I wanted to be able to research in a different area of physics e.g. condensed matter would this be possible with a PhD in physics education ? I was thinking of doing an MSc in theoretical physics or condensed matter after the physics education PhD for my own interests and I wasn't sure if the MSc in a related research area with a PhD in non-related area would enable me to research in a different field than physics education.

Any advice would be much appreciated!
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dwd40physics said:
however I wasn't sure if this PhD would enable me to lecture at university level later on ?
Lecture in what classes? Education classes?
 
dwd40physics said:
I am currently a physics teacher at secondary school level (high school). I have been offered to do a PhD in physics education in an area of research that interests me and relates to physics teaching.
By this, I suppose that you have an offer from a specific university. Could you disclose it ? Is it a Ph.D. in physics or a Ph.D. in education?
dwd40physics said:
if I wanted to be able to research in a different area of physics e.g. condensed matter would this be possible with a PhD in physics education ?
Not without specific training in those fields. I doubt that an MS in a pure physics discipline and a Ph.D. in physics education would get you as far as a Ph.D. in that discipline.

I would guess that there are fewer universities doing research in physics education than in condensed matter research thus limiting career choices.
 
OP:

* I never heard of a PhD in physics education before, so I looked up a number of programs. There are sufficient variations that we need more details from you. For example, some programs are setup as interdisciplinary programs between the dept of physics and the dept of education. You are admitted through one of the depts, and the details of the programs depend on the dept you enroll in. For example, in a couple of programs I looked at, if you enroll through the physics dept, you must take the same required grad physics courses and pass the same required qual exam as the regular physics PhD students. If your program is structured this way, then obviously there would be no point in getting a follow-on MS Physics. So how is your program structured?

* Regardless of the formal course and exam requirements, your thesis research and dissertation will be focussed on a topic in physics education, not on a technical topic in physics per se. Therefore, if you later want to do research in a technical topic (e.g., condensed matter), you will not have the proper research training and experience. Even if you later were to pursue a mainstream MS Physics with a thesis requirement (many don't have one), any research training and experience you gain there will be considerably abbreviated relative to that which you would gain in a full mainstream PhD Physics thesis program.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21, gleem and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
487