Physics Help: Solve a Sliding Child Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter roxxyroxx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Sliding
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a child sliding down a 4.0 m high slide, starting from rest and reaching a speed of 3.5 m/s at the bottom. The focus is on determining the percentage of gravitational potential energy that has not been converted into kinetic energy by the time the child reaches the bottom of the slide.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to use gravitational potential energy instead of elastic potential energy. There are attempts to calculate both kinetic energy at the bottom and gravitational potential energy at the top. Some participants express uncertainty about the initial steps and the correctness of their calculations.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding the types of energy to consider, and some calculations have been presented. There is an ongoing exploration of how to determine the percentage of energy not transformed, with participants engaging in checking assumptions and discussing the relationships between potential and kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted the importance of verifying calculations and assumptions regarding energy types. There is an acknowledgment of the need to clarify the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy in the context of the problem.

roxxyroxx
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Physics help?

Homework Statement



a child with a mass m slides down a 4.0 m high slide. starting from rest, the child has a speed of 3.5 m/s at the bottom of the slide. what percent of the gravitational potential energy of the child at the top of the slide hasn't been transformed into kinetic energy once the child reaches the bottom?

Homework Equations



Ee = 0.5kx^2
Ek = 0.5mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



idk where 2 start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Since the child is at a distance above the ground, you should use gravitational potential energy instead of Ee (Elastic potential energy)

Find the kinetic energy of the child at the bottom and then find the gravitational pe at the top of the slide.
 


rock.freak667 said:
Since the child is at a distance above the ground, you should use gravitational potential energy instead of Ee (Elastic potential energy)

Find the kinetic energy of the child at the bottom and then find the gravitational pe at the top of the slide.

Ek = 6.1(mass)
Ep = 39.2 (mass)
now...
 


roxxyroxx said:
Ek = 6.1(mass)
Ep = 39.2 (mass)
now...

I didnt check the numbers, I am assuming they are right. So you have the potential energy, and the final kinetic energy. You want to find what percent of the gravitational potential energy of the child at the top of the slide hasn't been transformed into kinetic energy once the child reaches the bottom. So you can see that there was just more potential energy than kinetic energy, so there is a difference there.

So to find the % of Gpe that hasnt been transformed just subtract the 2 to get the amount of energy lost. To find the % of Gpe that wasnt transformed just divide (The difference of PE and KE/ Total GPE) x 100
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K