Physics Lab Help - Moment of inertia and acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the total moment of inertia in a physics lab experiment using MotionLab software. The equation used to relate acceleration to total moment of inertia is I = r²/a * m(g - a). Participants express difficulties in interpreting the graphs generated by MotionLab and determining the correct acceleration to use in their calculations. Clarifications regarding the setup, including the role of the axle and the string attachment, are also discussed to address potential oscillations in the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia calculations for rigid bodies
  • Familiarity with MotionLab software for data analysis
  • Knowledge of Newton's second law and its application in rotational dynamics
  • Basic principles of graph interpretation and linear regression analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and application of the moment of inertia equation I = r²/a * m(g - a)
  • Learn how to effectively use MotionLab software for analyzing motion data
  • Explore the effects of string attachment on rotational motion and oscillations
  • Study the principles of angular acceleration and its relationship with linear acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and laboratory technicians involved in experiments related to rotational dynamics and motion analysis.

NinjaChachi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In our physics lab we were to set up a system looking like this:
upload_2015-12-14_11-1-48.png

where the mass was released and the velocity/acceleration and of the ring was calculated using MotionLab software. Our goal was to find the predicted total moment of inertia by just calculating the moment of inertia of the ring, disk, and axle and comparing it to the actual using the acceleration we get. It was very easy to calculate the total inertia but I am having trouble interpreting the graphs motionlab gave us and relating that to the total moment of inertia.
I will attach the graphs we obtained in one trial (keep in mind the line of best fit is not fully accurate as we were short on time)
upload_2015-12-14_11-5-51.png

upload_2015-12-14_11-6-31.png


Homework Equations


I think we use the following equation to relate acceleration of the system to total moment of inertia
I=r^2/a * m(g-a)
and I already found all the individual moments of inertia which was not a problem

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried plugging in 13.8 from the Vx/time equation into my above equation and did not get remotely close to the same moment of inertia. What do I actually use as my acceleration? Also, is that total moment of inertia equation correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is x, in relation to the set-up?
Why would it oscillate? There's no obvious reason for oscillations in the diagram. Is it to do with how the string is attached to the spool? What is the meant by '3 stage spool'?
In your predicted equations, position comes out as constant 1, while velocity comes out as constant zero. Are all the constants becoming zero because there are not enough digits shown?
 
haruspex said:
What is x, in relation to the set-up?
Why would it oscillate? There's no obvious reason for oscillations in the diagram. Is it to do with how the string is attached to the spool? What is the meant by '3 stage spool'?
In your predicted equations, position comes out as constant 1, while velocity comes out as constant zero. Are all the constants becoming zero because there are not enough digits shown?
x is simply the position. We took a video looking down on the disk. Disregard the '3 stage spool' we didn't have the string wrapped around that. just around the axle. We didn't truly predict these lines of best fit either. More of a guess than anything. I just really don't know how to get acceleration out of these graphs/formulas.
 
NinjaChachi said:
x is simply the position. We took a video looking down on the disk. Disregard the '3 stage spool' we didn't have the string wrapped around that. just around the axle. We didn't truly predict these lines of best fit either. More of a guess than anything. I just really don't know how to get acceleration out of these graphs/formulas.
Yes, but position of what? Ok, I think I've figured it out... it's the x-coordinate of some point on the disk, right? Hence the oscillation.
So you need equations which predict the position and velocity on the assumption of constant angular acceleration and a moment of inertia I. Your equations are of the right form, but don't reference I. Presumably you know the weight of the descending mass and radius of the axle.

Why did you not use the spool? How was the string wrapped around the axle, exactly? Did the later turns wrap over the early turns, effectively increasing the radius, or were you careful to ensure that all turns contacted the axle directly?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K