Pigging or Flushing a 15 km Non-Uniform Pipeline

  • Thread starter Thread starter Finchh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cleaning Pressure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on cleaning a 15 km non-uniform pipeline that alternates between 4" and 6" Schedule 80 sections, featuring reducers, bends, and a non-barred tee section. The calculated pressure loss is approximately 30 bar at a flow velocity of 1 m/s, with no available vent points posing challenges for both flushing and pigging operations. Participants emphasize the need for appropriate pig selection, such as dual-diameter or adaptable pigs, and suggest evaluating pump requirements to maintain the necessary 30 bar head for effective cleaning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pipeline cleaning methods, specifically pigging and flushing.
  • Familiarity with pressure loss calculations in fluid dynamics.
  • Knowledge of pipeline configurations, including reducers and tees.
  • Experience with pump selection and requirements for maintaining pressure.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research dual-diameter and adaptable pigs for non-uniform pipelines.
  • Learn about hydrostatic flushing techniques for pipelines without vent points.
  • Investigate pump specifications to achieve and maintain 30 bar pressure in pipeline cleaning.
  • Explore the impact of eccentric vs. concentric transitions in pipeline design on cleaning efficiency.
USEFUL FOR

Pipeline engineers, maintenance professionals, and anyone involved in the cleaning and maintenance of non-uniform pipelines will benefit from this discussion.

Finchh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I’m looking for some guidance on cleaning a 15 km non-uniform pipeline that alternates between 4" and 6" Schedule 80 sections, with reducers, bends, and a non-barred tee section (P&ID attached for reference). We’ve calculated a total pressure loss of approximately 30 bar at a flow velocity of 1 m/s, accounting for friction, bends, and head loss. There are no vent points available, so air displacement is a concern for both flushing and pigging operations.

Pipeline Details:​

  • Length: 15 km
  • Diameters: Alternating 4" and 6" Schedule 80 sections
  • Pressure Loss: Around 30 bar at 1 m/s flow velocity
  • Tee Section: Non-barred tee included in the line
  • Vent Points: None available
Given the diameter transitions and the non-barred tee section, I’m evaluating both pigging and flushing options. If anyone has insights on handling non-uniform lines with tees in terms of pig selection (such as dual-diameter or adaptable pigs) or advice on flushing setups to manage air displacement without vent points, I’d appreciate it. Additionally, any suggestions on pump requirements to consistently achieve the 30 bar head for this configuration would be extremely helpful.

Thanks in advance for your input!
6 & 4 inch line.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
I have no experience with pigging, but does it work with such small diameter pipes and varying diameters like this? (not to mention such tight turns)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
32K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K