Pigging or Flushing a 15 km Non-Uniform Pipeline

  • Thread starter Thread starter Finchh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cleaning Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Guidance is sought for cleaning a 15 km non-uniform pipeline with alternating 4" and 6" sections, facing a pressure loss of approximately 30 bar at a flow velocity of 1 m/s. The pipeline lacks vent points, raising concerns about air displacement during flushing and pigging operations. The discussion includes evaluating pigging options, such as dual-diameter pigs, and flushing setups to manage air effectively. Additionally, there are inquiries about pump requirements to maintain the necessary pressure head for the pipeline configuration. The conversation highlights the challenges of cleaning without pig traps and the implications of the pipeline's design on cleaning methods.
Finchh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I’m looking for some guidance on cleaning a 15 km non-uniform pipeline that alternates between 4" and 6" Schedule 80 sections, with reducers, bends, and a non-barred tee section (P&ID attached for reference). We’ve calculated a total pressure loss of approximately 30 bar at a flow velocity of 1 m/s, accounting for friction, bends, and head loss. There are no vent points available, so air displacement is a concern for both flushing and pigging operations.

Pipeline Details:​

  • Length: 15 km
  • Diameters: Alternating 4" and 6" Schedule 80 sections
  • Pressure Loss: Around 30 bar at 1 m/s flow velocity
  • Tee Section: Non-barred tee included in the line
  • Vent Points: None available
Given the diameter transitions and the non-barred tee section, I’m evaluating both pigging and flushing options. If anyone has insights on handling non-uniform lines with tees in terms of pig selection (such as dual-diameter or adaptable pigs) or advice on flushing setups to manage air displacement without vent points, I’d appreciate it. Additionally, any suggestions on pump requirements to consistently achieve the 30 bar head for this configuration would be extremely helpful.

Thanks in advance for your input!
6 & 4 inch line.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have no experience with pigging, but does it work with such small diameter pipes and varying diameters like this? (not to mention such tight turns)
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Back
Top