PIN Photodiode, High Voc, Low Isc

  • Thread starter Thread starter Qianlong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photodiode Pin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the performance characteristics of a silicon PIN photodiode in photovoltaic mode, specifically examining open-circuit voltage (Voc) and short-circuit current (Isc) under varying light intensities. The photodiode has a maximum operating current of 10mA and an active area of 20mm². Measurements were conducted using a Fluke 187 digital multimeter, which revealed Voc values ranging from 40μV to 350mV, with Isc measured at 1.4μA when Voc exceeded 250mV. The discussion also addresses the inability to measure the barrier potential across the junction with a voltmeter due to current flow and internal resistance of the measuring device.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of silicon PIN photodiode operation
  • Knowledge of open-circuit voltage (Voc) and short-circuit current (Isc) measurements
  • Familiarity with the Fluke 187 digital multimeter specifications
  • Basic principles of semiconductor physics, including barrier potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of temperature on saturation current (I0) in photodiodes
  • Explore the use of Fluke 289 for precise current and voltage measurements
  • Study the relationship between optical power and photocurrent in photodiodes
  • Investigate methods to minimize background electrical noise in measurements
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, researchers in photonics, and anyone involved in the design or testing of photodiodes and photovoltaic systems will benefit from this discussion.

Qianlong
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am working with a silicon PIN-type photodiode in photovoltaic mode, conducting measurements of open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current for varying intensities of incident light. The light is being measured as a proxy for another quantity, and so I must apologise for I can give no quantitative values of optical power.

The photodiode has a claimed max “Operating Current” of 10mA, and an active area of 20mm^2.

The measuring apparatus is a fluke 187 digital multimeter, which can measure to precisions of tens of microvolts and tens of nanoamps, though in the setup there is some background noise (probably electrical) that renders the last digit unreliable. Attempts have also been made to measure current with a moving coil microammeter, which has a resistance of 150Ω.

As I understand it, with increasing optical power incident on the detector, the short-circuit current should increase linearly and be equal to the photocurrent. The open-circuit voltage should increase logarithmically, but for low optical powers, the increase is approximately linear*.

*The open circuit voltage is given by the equation V = KT/q ln[(I/Io +1)], which for values of I/Io<<1 the Mercator series can be used to yield V=KT/q I/Io

Open-circuit voltages have been detected at both at ultra-low light levels and in ambient environmental lighting. The open-circuit voltage s in these scenarios has ranged from 40μV to 350mV. Linearity is confirmed up until about 20mV. However, when the short-circuit current is measured, nothing is seen until the open-circuit voltage for the same light intensity exceeds 250mV. At this light intensity, the current is 1.4μA.

My question: is the current just that small? Other measurements (albeit for p-n junctions) I have seen reported in the literature record that light intensities that lead to 1mV open-circuit voltages lead to at least 1μA short-circuit currents. Certainly, one would have thought that a current much closer to 10mA would have been seen in ambient environmental lighting.

There is a second question I wished to ask, and it relates more to the theory. I understand that when p-type semiconductor is connected with n-type semiconductor, the majority carrier in each type diffuses along the concentration gradient. This leave behind ions, trapped in the crystal lattice, which generate an electrical field that opposes further diffusion. Forgive my ignorance, but why can this “barrier potential” not be read by a voltmeter placed in parallel around the junction?

Greatly obliged for your assistance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The fluke multimeter has some internal resistance. I don't know how much (and it depends on the measurement range: smaller ranges correspond to larger internal resistances), but that could reduce the current significantly.

Unrelated to that, at the level of millivolts you can have temperature effects that lead to additional voltage differences.

As far as I know, 1.4µA is not at the lower end of the fluke precision - do you see a sudden jump in the current?

Forgive my ignorance, but why can this “barrier potential” not be read by a voltmeter placed in parallel around the junction?
Current flows through the voltmeter (and the timescale is way too short to see that) until the potential is equal at both sides. That is true for every setup without a power supply.
 
Qianlong said:
the open-circuit voltage for the same light intensity exceeds 250mV. At this light intensity, the current is 1.4μA. My question: is the current just that small?

Yes, that actually sounds quite reasonable.

The key to understanding this is to realize just how small I_0 is. It's value is very temperature dependent (due to its dependence on N_i^2), but even at I=1.4uA the ratio I/I_0 is likely to be order of around magnitude 10^5 or so.

Put this value into the equation for voltage and you'll find that it does indeed correspond to somewhere around 250 mV.
 
Last edited:
mfb said:
The fluke multimeter has some internal resistance. I don't know how much (and it depends on the measurement range: smaller ranges correspond to larger internal resistances), but that could reduce the current significantly.
Update: I tested that with a Fluke289, and at 1µA, the voltage is well below 1mV (measured: 0.15mV, but that is not reliable*). That is not an issue if the multimeters are not completely different.

*Edit: A more careful measurement showed 0.10mV.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K