Pitfalls of E&M or QM without classical mechanics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential challenges and considerations for an engineering student wishing to take advanced courses in electromagnetism (E&M) and quantum mechanics (QM) without having completed a classical mechanics course. It explores the implications of course prerequisites and the differences between engineering and physics approaches to these subjects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the requirements for QM may include knowledge of Lagrange and Hamilton formalism, as well as phase space concepts, which could be self-studied if not covered in prior courses.
  • Another participant emphasizes that mathematical knowledge, particularly in vectors and tensors, may be more critical for E&M than classical mechanics knowledge.
  • It is suggested that problem-solving techniques from classical mechanics may be assumed knowledge in E&M courses, potentially creating challenges for students without that background.
  • A participant inquires about the texts used in the courses, indicating a need for understanding the curriculum and expectations.
  • It is mentioned that the physics department uses Taylor for classical mechanics and Griffiths for E&M, while the engineering course utilizes Ulaby's "Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the importance of classical mechanics for E&M and QM, indicating that there is no consensus on whether the lack of a classical mechanics background would be a significant disadvantage.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the variability in course content and expectations between engineering and physics departments, as well as the potential gaps in knowledge that may arise from differing educational paths.

Who May Find This Useful

Students transitioning from engineering to physics, educators in STEM fields, and individuals interested in the prerequisites for advanced studies in electromagnetism and quantum mechanics.

axmls
Education Advisor
Messages
942
Reaction score
395
I'm an EE major doing a minor in physics. I have to take a standard intermediate electromagnetism course from the engineering department (which is just a more applied version of the physics department course). To get my minor, I was thinking about getting permission to use this course as a prereq to take the second E&M course (electrodynamics). In addition, I'd also like to take the introductory quantum mechanics course out of my own personal interests.

The prereq for the first E&M course in the physics department is a course in classicalc mechanics. Assuming I can, in a special case, get into the electrodynamics course, would I face any difficulties not having taken classical mechanics? What about for the quantum mechanics course?

Also: will I be at a major disadvantage taking a physics electrodynamics course after an engineering first course in electromagnetism? Our EE department does not have more than one E&M course, and so the physics department is my only option for more.

For reference: I've taken the standard freshman-level E&M course already.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It always depends on the courses, their focus, the knowledge the lecturer takes as granted and so on.
Quantum mechanic courses will probably require some knowledge of Lagrange- and Hamilton formalism, the concept of phase space and related topics. It is possible to learn those topics with books, lectures are not necessary (but can be useful).
For electrodynamics, mathematical knowledge is probably more important than classical mechanics - vectors, tensors, concepts like the gradient, curl and other things in 3 or 3+1 dimensions.
 
But aside from the pure prerequisities which mfb describes, there are also problem-solving techniques which are important. It happens occasionally that techniques used in classical mechanics are used in E&M. This might be a problem since the professor might assume that people know these techniques from a previous course.
 
Do you know what texts are being used now, or have been used in the past, for these courses?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: micromass
George Jones said:
Do you know what texts are being used now, or have been used in the past, for these courses?
The department uses Taylor for classical mechanics and Griffiths for E&M.

The engineering E&M course uses "Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics" by Ulaby.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K