Planar wave normally incident on dielectric boundary

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the reflection of a parallel polarized planar wave at a dielectric boundary, specifically under two conditions of conductivity, σ, relative to the angular frequency, ω, and permittivity, ε. The incident power flux is given as P_i = 100 w/m², with the second medium characterized by ε = 4ε₀ and vacuum permeability. The calculated reflected power flux, P_reflected, is determined to be 100/9 w/m², but the impact of varying conductivity on this value remains unclear, leading to questions about the problem's formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation in dielectrics
  • Familiarity with complex permittivity and its implications
  • Knowledge of power flux calculations in electromagnetic theory
  • Proficiency in using the reflection coefficient formula, ρ = (η₂ - η)/(η + η₂)
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the effects of complex permittivity on wave reflection
  • Explore the implications of varying conductivity on electromagnetic wave behavior
  • Learn about the significance of the ratio σ/(ω*ε₀) in dielectric materials
  • Study the derivation and application of the reflection coefficient in different media
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in wave interactions with dielectric materials and the effects of conductivity on reflection phenomena.

cfitzU2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
PROBLEM: I am asked to consider a parallel polarized planar wave with frequency ω is normally incident on a dielectric boundary. The incident time average power flux P_i = 100 w/m^2. The first medium is free space and the second has vacuum permeability but ε=4ε_0. We are also given that the medium is characterized by conductivity σ.

I am then asked to find the reflected time average power flux P_reflected in two cases

(i) σ/(ω*ε_0)<<1 and (ii) σ/(ω*ε_0)>>1


My problem is that, while performing the calculation I see no use for the quantity in question, namely, σ/(ω*ε_0)...


ATTEMPT: I am able to find the reflected time average power flux using P_i = (1/2*η)(E_i)^2 = 100 w/m^2 with P_reflected = (1/2*η)(E_r)^2 and E_r = ρE_i where ρ=(η_2 - η)/(η+η_2).

This is especially simple after noting that η_2 = (1/2)η

The calculation leads to P_reflected = 100/9 w/m^2

I see no opportunity to consider how varying the conductivity changes that number... I realize that as σ gets big η_2 must go to zero... but we are given a fixed ε=4*ε_0

Am I missing something or is this a poorly posed (or trick) problem??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that the permitivity can me complex, but only the real part has been given. Remember that \eta is described interms of: \eta = \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\textbf{ε}}}, where \epsilon is actually the complex permitivity.

There is plenty potential to use \frac{\sigma}{\omega * \epsilon_{0}} &lt;&lt; 1 and \frac{\sigma}{\omega * \epsilon_{0}} &gt;&gt; 1 cases
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K