Plastic combustion engines and why aren't they used

Click For Summary
Plastic combustion engines have been practical since the 1980s, yet they are not widely adopted in automobiles due to the automotive industry's risk-averse nature and concerns over durability and cost. Experts argue that the technology has not been sufficiently vetted for mainstream use, leading to hesitation among manufacturers. There is frustration over taxpayer funding being directed towards poorly managed companies like GM and Chrysler instead of investing in innovative technologies like plastic engines. Critics highlight the influence of political contributions on government decisions, questioning the effectiveness of democracy in promoting beneficial advancements. The discussion underscores a need for a cultural shift towards supporting proven technologies rather than maintaining outdated practices.
  • #31


pantaz said:
Wikipedia mentions two "plastic engines" (without citations). I am very familiar with the first one. I worked for the engineer that was hired for independent analysis of its failure to function. (I was just an apprentice machinist, but the design flaws were obvious even to me.)

No citations are provided for the second engine mentioned, "based upon the Cosworth BDA".

From the article:

Shortly after Mr. Holtzberg’s first engine successfully ran, an article in Automotive Industries, a trade magazine, inquired, “What...a Plastic Engine?” Two years later, Popular Science featured a Polimotor on its cover. By then, Mr. Holtzberg had progressed to a second-generation 300-horsepower design weighing 152 pounds; a stock Pinto engine made 88 horsepower and weighed 415 pounds.

To prove that his plastic powerplant was durable, Mr. Holtzberg campaigned a Lola racecar in the International Motor Sports Association’s Camel Lights series. Amoco Chemical provided financial backing to promote its Torlon plastic resin. The only mishap during half-a-dozen 1984 and 1985 races was the failure of a connecting rod, a part purchased from an outside supplier.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32


Vinni said:
From the article:
That newspaper article appears to be based solely on an interview with Holtzberg. I tried a couple of Google searches and the only additional sources seem to be old forum posts.
 
  • #33


pantaz said:
That newspaper article appears to be based solely on an interview with Holtzberg. I tried a couple of Google searches and the only additional sources seem to be old forum posts.

Hardly just Mr. Holtzberg;

Ed Graham, engineering manager at ProtoCam in Northampton, Pa was cited.

James Huntsman, vice president of the advanced materials division at Huntsman Corporation, was cited.

Richard A. Schultz, a consultant at Ducker Worldwide, was cited.

Jay Baron, president and chief executive of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich, was cited.

And Popular Science wrote an article about it and made it the cover story and Automotive Industries wrote about the engine.
 
Last edited:
  • #34


Vinni said:
Hardly just Mr. Holtzberg;

Ed Graham, engineering manager at ProtoCam in Northampton, Pa was cited.
The article's quote from Ed Graham is about "using Mr. Holtzberg’s approach to manufacture rapid-prototyping components". He's made parts for "experimental engines and transmissions."

James Huntsman, vice president of the advanced materials division at Huntsman Corporation, was cited.
Huntsman only says, "We’re convinced that the time is right for a composite engine." That's a long way from demonstrating a functional engine.

Richard A. Schultz, a consultant at Ducker Worldwide, was cited.
Mr. Schultz talks only about a potential problem with manufacturing wheels from plastic instead of aluminum.

Jay Baron, president and chief executive of the Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich, was cited.
Mr. Baron was the most on-point with our discussion here: "They’re not about to manufacture thousands of vehicles with engines that could fail in service," he said. "Since plastic engine castings are outside any car company's mainstream business, all the cost, processing and durability issues would have to be resolved in the supply base."

And Popular Science wrote an article about it and made it the cover story and Automotive Industries wrote about the engine.
Do you have links to those articles? I tried a couple of searches but didn't find anything relevant.

I'm not claiming that an internal combustion engine can't be constructed from composite materials. I just have not seen evidence of a functioning, all-composite* engine.

* "All composite" within reason -- I would expect metal fasteners, and likely a metal crankshaft. Also, the combustion chamber (cylinder liner, piston top, cylinder head) would likely require metal surfaces.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
I have to say, when I first looked at the thread title, I was expecting to see ICE's that used plastic as fuel. Haha

ICE's made out of plastic are equally impressive though. Though I don't know how long they would last. As a mechanic, I usually hate plastics in the engine bay. They almost always become brittle in the dry heat over time. Also they usually give you nice scratches all over your arms when you work in proximity to them.

There are a couple things that would be needed to take into account for this to be feasible in my eyes. One, if the cylinder heads are also made out of plastic I would try to opt for a springless valvetrain. The immense tension put on the springs from the cam would easily pop a cam bearing cap over time or possibly even crack the head... If an aluminum head is used with the plastic block, you'd have to watch the heat expansion of the head to make sure you don't pull the threads out of the block.

Not to mention, novice mechanics tend to over tighten everything. I would expect a lot of parts to crack just from the mechanic tightening the bolts.

It's a good idea and it will work. But, the question is how long will it work before you encounter problems.
 
  • #36
Vinni said:
but the plastic combustal engine was made practical in 1980 or so! Literally making cars far lighter

It's not clear that there would be much benefit. Car buyers don't want light-weight cars and they don't want fuel efficient cars. This is demonstrated by all the over-sized and over-powered cars that people choose to buy. When was the last time you saw a 3-wheeled covered motorcycle? Many people don't need much more than that but they still buy much more.

The production cost may actually be higher. The article mentioned longer cycle times. There are also all the metal inserts that are needed on a plastic engine, but can be cast directly into a metal block.

Furthermore, this material is likely to be non-recyclable (it's a thermoset), and produced from oil (ever increasing cost). Aluminium and steel are heavily recycled, which makes them more sustainable.
 
  • #37
Allenman said:
It's a good idea and it will work. But, the question is how long will it work before you encounter problems.

Yes I think that's the reason a lot of wonderful sounding ideas never end up in production. There are a million and one novel ideas for engines. Even the original Diesel engine was a complete failure. The inventor thought it would revolutionize engines, but it turned out blowing coal dust into the cylinders wasn't good for reliability.
 
  • #38
Allenman said:
I have to say, when I first looked at the thread title, I was expecting to see ICE's that used plastic as fuel. Haha

ICE's made out of plastic are equally impressive though. Though I don't know how long they would last. As a mechanic, I usually hate plastics in the engine bay. They almost always become brittle in the dry heat over time. Also they usually give you nice scratches all over your arms when you work in proximity to them.

There are a couple things that would be needed to take into account for this to be feasible in my eyes. One, if the cylinder heads are also made out of plastic I would try to opt for a springless valvetrain. The immense tension put on the springs from the cam would easily pop a cam bearing cap over time or possibly even crack the head... If an aluminum head is used with the plastic block, you'd have to watch the heat expansion of the head to make sure you don't pull the threads out of the block.

Not to mention, novice mechanics tend to over tighten everything. I would expect a lot of parts to crack just from the mechanic tightening the bolts.

It's a good idea and it will work. But, the question is how long will it work before you encounter problems.

I also wonder if it such a good idea - ie reliable and easily manufactured - that it hasn't caught on, less alone tried, with other types of machinery besides automobiles. Weight is a criteria in chain saws and leaf blowers, especially when using one of these in a full time occupation. Who also would not like a light portable generator to lug around in the back of his pickup?
I presume that after time vibrations would just cause the plastic engine to self destruct. I doubt if its life cycle could be made as long as a metal engine block and header, as the plastic engine would suffer horribly from fatigue. I am surmissing here, but if that is true the engineering tolerances would have to be reduced and up goes your cost of manufacture.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
23K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K