Timbre
- 7
- 0
- TL;DR Summary
- I was taught as everyone, the basic elevator changing velocity question. Yet nobody has ever explained this, it's held as obvious. Please explain.
Hello,
I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question.
Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world.
The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion. The elevator begins to negatively accelerate to stop at the designated floor. What does the scale read when the elevator begins to decelerate (negatively accelerate), change velocity.
The answer is supposedly always that the scale reads less than it did when the person stood on it when the elevator was traveling at a constant rate.
I don't understand how physics uses acceleration of gravity yet they'll say that the rate of deceleration of the elevator does not factor.
Now, I'll say upfront that I understand this is a question used to illustrate a basic concept. And it presumes things like the distance from the center of the earth doesn't factor (less gravity further away), and factors like a spring in the scale (potentially exerting force to push the person and the elevator apart) also does not factor.
But I do factor the acceleration of gravity. Is the simple answer that this model is meant to be very simple and doesn't factor gravity as acceleration, it does so as a force, this is 101 physics, so that's why it doesn't make sense to me? I can accept that, and if that's the case, please tell me so and skip the rest of this.
The reason I don't understand this, is that gravity is moving things closer together, changing the rate that their distance differs. So why wouldn't that factor in the elevator example. Why can't the elevator decelerate at a rate that matches or is below that of the acceleration of gravity? And the scale would then read the person's weight while decelerating.
I could break it down if anyone would like: If we focus closer and closer in time, it appears paradoxical to me. So, the elevator is in X relation, distance from the person. The elevator begins to change velocity, slows. The person would continue in motion because no other force is acting on him, he's not tethered to the scale/elevator. But at that same moment he'd begin to move away from the elevator floor, gravity would also be moving him toward it.
Because gravity is a change in velocity, and thus the elevator's change in velocity could be canceled by gravity's, no? To a point. If the elevator decelerated more rapidly than 9.8 m/s/s, then it'd pull away from the person and the distance between person and elevator would increase, registered as "lighter" on the scale.
And exactly at 9.8 m/s/s? I'm unsure how to answer that, haven't thought it through. I assume the scale would read the same, as it'd match deceleration of the elevator/acceleration of gravity.
This also reflects a question of which physics equations to use, which I've never been clear on. Sometimes gravity is treated as a force and other times acceleration, and I've never understood how or why. I understand it's a force in a static equation, but acceleration when bodies are moving apart...but that's again to the crux of my elevator question, wouldn't we switch equations the moment the elevator began to decelerate? Why would we use the same equation with gravity as a force, in a static diagram, when the elevator begins to change velocity, and it's presumed in the supposed right answer that the bodies (elevator and person) are separating.
Thanks, All. :)
I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question.
Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world.
The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion. The elevator begins to negatively accelerate to stop at the designated floor. What does the scale read when the elevator begins to decelerate (negatively accelerate), change velocity.
The answer is supposedly always that the scale reads less than it did when the person stood on it when the elevator was traveling at a constant rate.
I don't understand how physics uses acceleration of gravity yet they'll say that the rate of deceleration of the elevator does not factor.
Now, I'll say upfront that I understand this is a question used to illustrate a basic concept. And it presumes things like the distance from the center of the earth doesn't factor (less gravity further away), and factors like a spring in the scale (potentially exerting force to push the person and the elevator apart) also does not factor.
But I do factor the acceleration of gravity. Is the simple answer that this model is meant to be very simple and doesn't factor gravity as acceleration, it does so as a force, this is 101 physics, so that's why it doesn't make sense to me? I can accept that, and if that's the case, please tell me so and skip the rest of this.
The reason I don't understand this, is that gravity is moving things closer together, changing the rate that their distance differs. So why wouldn't that factor in the elevator example. Why can't the elevator decelerate at a rate that matches or is below that of the acceleration of gravity? And the scale would then read the person's weight while decelerating.
I could break it down if anyone would like: If we focus closer and closer in time, it appears paradoxical to me. So, the elevator is in X relation, distance from the person. The elevator begins to change velocity, slows. The person would continue in motion because no other force is acting on him, he's not tethered to the scale/elevator. But at that same moment he'd begin to move away from the elevator floor, gravity would also be moving him toward it.
Because gravity is a change in velocity, and thus the elevator's change in velocity could be canceled by gravity's, no? To a point. If the elevator decelerated more rapidly than 9.8 m/s/s, then it'd pull away from the person and the distance between person and elevator would increase, registered as "lighter" on the scale.
And exactly at 9.8 m/s/s? I'm unsure how to answer that, haven't thought it through. I assume the scale would read the same, as it'd match deceleration of the elevator/acceleration of gravity.
This also reflects a question of which physics equations to use, which I've never been clear on. Sometimes gravity is treated as a force and other times acceleration, and I've never understood how or why. I understand it's a force in a static equation, but acceleration when bodies are moving apart...but that's again to the crux of my elevator question, wouldn't we switch equations the moment the elevator began to decelerate? Why would we use the same equation with gravity as a force, in a static diagram, when the elevator begins to change velocity, and it's presumed in the supposed right answer that the bodies (elevator and person) are separating.
Thanks, All. :)