A Please Explain Elementary Physics Elevator Question

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Timbre
  • Start date Start date
Timbre
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I was taught as everyone, the basic elevator changing velocity question. Yet nobody has ever explained this, it's held as obvious. Please explain.
Hello,

I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question.


Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world.

The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion. The elevator begins to negatively accelerate to stop at the designated floor. What does the scale read when the elevator begins to decelerate (negatively accelerate), change velocity.

The answer is supposedly always that the scale reads less than it did when the person stood on it when the elevator was traveling at a constant rate.

I don't understand how physics uses acceleration of gravity yet they'll say that the rate of deceleration of the elevator does not factor.

Now, I'll say upfront that I understand this is a question used to illustrate a basic concept. And it presumes things like the distance from the center of the earth doesn't factor (less gravity further away), and factors like a spring in the scale (potentially exerting force to push the person and the elevator apart) also does not factor.

But I do factor the acceleration of gravity. Is the simple answer that this model is meant to be very simple and doesn't factor gravity as acceleration, it does so as a force, this is 101 physics, so that's why it doesn't make sense to me? I can accept that, and if that's the case, please tell me so and skip the rest of this.


The reason I don't understand this, is that gravity is moving things closer together, changing the rate that their distance differs. So why wouldn't that factor in the elevator example. Why can't the elevator decelerate at a rate that matches or is below that of the acceleration of gravity? And the scale would then read the person's weight while decelerating.


I could break it down if anyone would like: If we focus closer and closer in time, it appears paradoxical to me. So, the elevator is in X relation, distance from the person. The elevator begins to change velocity, slows. The person would continue in motion because no other force is acting on him, he's not tethered to the scale/elevator. But at that same moment he'd begin to move away from the elevator floor, gravity would also be moving him toward it.

Because gravity is a change in velocity, and thus the elevator's change in velocity could be canceled by gravity's, no? To a point. If the elevator decelerated more rapidly than 9.8 m/s/s, then it'd pull away from the person and the distance between person and elevator would increase, registered as "lighter" on the scale.

And exactly at 9.8 m/s/s? I'm unsure how to answer that, haven't thought it through. I assume the scale would read the same, as it'd match deceleration of the elevator/acceleration of gravity.

This also reflects a question of which physics equations to use, which I've never been clear on. Sometimes gravity is treated as a force and other times acceleration, and I've never understood how or why. I understand it's a force in a static equation, but acceleration when bodies are moving apart...but that's again to the crux of my elevator question, wouldn't we switch equations the moment the elevator began to decelerate? Why would we use the same equation with gravity as a force, in a static diagram, when the elevator begins to change velocity, and it's presumed in the supposed right answer that the bodies (elevator and person) are separating.

Thanks, All. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you understand what a (bathroom) scale reads? If so, then please post it here in your own words. It is a good starting point and we'll take it from there. It is not at clear to me what question you are asking in post #1, but before attempting to answer your questions, we need first to ascertain what you don't understand.
 
A bathroom scale reads weight, but we call that mass, force if using gravity as a constant static force, or in this situation it indicates the relative position of two objects, the person and the elevator (and assumes that the scale exerts no force to push the objects apart (such as an internal spring in the scale).

The question is why do we use an equation where gravity is a force, a constant, in a static equation, when answer to the question presumes that the bodies are moving apart, in a kinetic state, where gravity would be acceleration, not a constant force. (The "correct" answer is that the scale reads less when the elevator begins to decelerate than it did when at a constant velocity.)
 
Last edited:
Timbre said:
The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion. The elevator begins to negatively accelerate to stop at the designated floor. What does the scale read when the elevator begins to decelerate (negatively accelerate), change velocity.
Without the interference of the elevator, that person would be freely falling.
That interference can be minimum if the cables break, or maximum when it starts moving upwards.

If the elevator could accelerate upwards at three times the magnitude of the acceleration of gravity (3g), the scale would show three times the normal weight of the person.

If the elevator could be propelled down, accelerating downwards at three times the magnitude of the acceleration of gravity (3g), the scale would show no weight of the person, whose head would be pressing on the ceiling of the elevator with a force of 2mg.
 
Timbre said:
A bathroom scale reads weight, but we call that mass, force . . .
A bathroom scale uses a spring, or strain gauge or other such sensor to display the force pushing down on its surface divided by the acceleration of gravity ##g = 9.8~\text{m/s}^2##. It does not read weight or mass. Weight is the force with which the Earth attracts a body and that force is the same regardless of whether the body is on a scale or not.

You can easily verify that by pushing down on a scale with your hand. The reading on the scale will depend on how hard you push down and is not your weight. Note that Newton's 3rd law says that if you push down on the scale with force ##F## the scale pushes up on your hand with force ##F##.
So, if you are standing on a scale in an elevator the reading on the scale will be

1. equal to your weight divided by ##g## if the elevator is moving at constant velocity because the scale has to support only your weight;

2. greater than your weight divided by ##g## if the elevator is accelerating up because the scale has to support all your weight plus accelerate your body up against gravity;

3. less than your weight divided by ##g## if the elevator is accelerating down because the scale has to support only part of your weight while gravity does the rest;

4. zero if the elevator is in free fall because it doesn't matter whether you are standing on the scale or not since you cannot push down on it. Nevertheless, your weight is not zero because the Earth still attracts you with force ##mg.##
 
Timbre said:
The reason I don't understand this, is that gravity is moving things closer together, changing the rate that their distance differs.

No it doesn't! Gravity tends to move things closer together, because the gravitational force is always attractive. Part of your confusion may be from mixing up the gravitational force with the gravitational acceleration. If the gravitational force is the only force acting on an object near Earth's surface, the object will accelerate at about 9.8 m/s2, the so-called gravitational acceleration.

If another force also acts on that object, we can calculate its acceleration by looking at the net force. So, for example, if my mass is 100 kg, Earth exerts a downward gravitational force on me that has a magnitude of about 980 N. If I'm at rest standing on a bathroom scale the scale exerts an upward force on me of magnitude 980 N, we call this the normal force. Thus the net force acting on me is zero and my acceleration is zero.

Timbre said:
A bathroom scale reads weight

No, it reads the magnitude of the normal force! So if I'm at rest (or equivalently moving with a constant velocity) it reads 980 N. But if I'm not at rest or not moving with a constant velocity it will not read 980 N. Let's say I'm accelerating and the scale reads 880 N. Therefore there's a downward gravitational force acting on me of magnitude 980 N and an upward normal force of magnitude 880 N. The net force is therefore downward and has a magnitude of 100 N. If I divide the net force by my mass, I get a downward acceleration that has a magnitude of 1.0 m/s2. Thus I could be in an elevator moving upward and slowing down. (Or the elevator could be moving downward and speeding up).
 
Thread ''splain this hydrostatic paradox in tiny words'
This is (ostensibly) not a trick shot or video*. The scale was balanced before any blue water was added. 550mL of blue water was added to the left side. only 60mL of water needed to be added to the right side to re-balance the scale. Apparently, the scale will balance when the height of the two columns is equal. The left side of the scale only feels the weight of the column above the lower "tail" of the funnel (i.e. 60mL). So where does the weight of the remaining (550-60=) 490mL go...
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. I am in no way trolling. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. Yes, I'm questioning the most elementary physics question we're given in this world. The classic elevator in motion question: A person is standing on a scale in an elevator that is in constant motion...
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
9K
Replies
128
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top