Please help with Motion Problem, looks easy but is confusing (to me)

  • Thread starter Thread starter accesskb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a physics problem involving a boulder dropping from a cliff, where the hiker observes it takes 1.5 seconds to fall the last third of the distance. Participants are trying to determine the height of the cliff, with one student suggesting the answer is approximately 172.5 meters. However, two other contributors calculate the height to be around 356 meters and 328 meters, respectively, indicating a significant discrepancy in their solutions. The original poster expresses frustration with the problem and seeks clarification on the correct approach. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying motion formulas in physics problems.
accesskb
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I've spent a long time and wasted lots of paper on this question. It might be very easy to do but I have tried/used every one of the motion formulas and don't seem to get a right answer. This is one of those challenge question that our teacher has given us. He hasn't worked out the answer himself yet but one of the student who was able to get it says the answer is about 172.5m

Please could help me out with this Motion problem. Appreciate all the help. thnx

A hiker sees a boulder drop from the top of a cliff and notices that it takes 1.5seconds for the boulder to fall the last 1/3 of the way to the ground. What is the height of the cliff (in meters)?

here is a rough pic I drew:
http://www.clubbersnation.com/math/physics_problem.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
thnks Ambitwistor for the explanation :)
I have never tried any problems like this before. I shall work it out now. :smile:
 
My answer is about 356m. There's no difference between my solution and Ambitwistor's .


LTK
 
Luong tu Khanhwrote
My answer is about 356m. There's no difference between my solution and Ambitwistor's .

Looks like a difference of 29 meters to me! I get Ambitwistor's answer (well, actually I get 327.7 m which I would round to 328).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top