Projectile Motion/ Air Resistance Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two questions related to projectile motion and kinetic energy, specifically focusing on the effects of air resistance and the comparison of kinetic energies of two objects dropped from a height. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply energy conservation principles to determine the initial speed of an arrow affected by air resistance and to compare the kinetic energies of two objects dropped from a height. Some participants question the methods used and suggest focusing on ratios for simplification.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, with some expressing confusion about specific steps in their reasoning. There has been helpful guidance offered regarding the approach to the second question, emphasizing the use of ratios in calculating kinetic energy differences.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is also a mention of a specific solution from a textbook that is being referenced, which may influence the discussion.

VanessaN
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
I actually have 2 questions that I am getting stuck on around the same point..

Question 1) An arrow with a mass of 80g is fired at an angle of 30 degrees to the horizontal. It strikes a target located 5 m above the firing point and impacts the target traveling at a speed of 20 meters/sec. If 10% of the initial energy of the arrow is lost to air resistance, what was the initial speed of the arrow?

My attempt at the problem: Energy final= Kf + Uf = 1/2*m*vf^2 + m*g*hf

Energy initial= Ki + Ui = 1/2*m*vi^2 + m*g*hi (but since initial height is 0)= 1/2*m*vi^2
Wnonconservative= Ei- Ef= 1/2*m*vi^2 -(1/2*m*vf^2 + m*g*hf)And since 10% of the initial energy is lost,
Wnonconservative= 0.1* Ei= 0.1* (1/2*m*vi^2)This next step is where I am getting confused, in solving for the initial speed:Wnonconservative= 1/2*m*vi^2 -(1/2*m*vf^2 + m*g*hf)so0.1* (1/2*m*vi^2)= 1/2*m*vi^2 -(1/2*m*vf^2 + m*g*hf)
The solution in the book is 23.5 m/s, but I don't know how to get it from here. Please help!

Question 2) Two different objects are dropped from rest off of a 50 m tall cliff. One lands going 30% faster than the other, and the two objects have the same mass. How much more kinetic energy does one object have at the landing than the other?
My attempt at the problem:
Vi=0

Vfinal, faster object= 1.3

Vfinal, slower object=1

initial height=50 m

final height= 0

mass,m
So the difference in kinetic energy is:

1/2 *m *(1.3v)^2 - 1/2 *m *v^2= ?
The answer is 69% more kinetic energy for the faster rock, but I'm having trouble finding out how to get that from here. Any help is very much appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
VanessaN said:
The solution in the book is 23.5 m/s, but I don't know how to get it from here. Please help
You have all of the values except vi. Simply solve for vi and insert the values in the resulting equation.

VanessaN said:
The answer is 69% more kinetic energy for the faster rock, but I'm having trouble finding out how to get that from here.
You are looking for the ratio of the kinetic energies, not their difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: VanessaN
Thank you! I got the first question, but for the second question, I'm not sure if I'm using the correct method to get the answer..

1/2* m * (1.3v)^2 - 1/2* m * v^2 = (supposed to equal) 0.69 * 1/2 * m * v^2, but how do I get that...

1/2* m * 1.69* v^2 - 1/2* m* v^2
= 0.845* m*v^2 - 0.5 * m* v^2
= 0.345 m*v^2 ... which if you multiply by 2 you get 0.69, so
= 0.69 * 1/2 * m * v^2

There we go! I think I got it now thank you :)

Is there any easier way to solve then doing all of that? Because it'd be tricky to remember to have to multiply the 0.345 * 2 to get 0.69 * 1/2 * m * v^2...but I guess I'll just have to remember to solve to get 1/2 * m * v^2 since we are solving for kinetic energy
 
Last edited:
VanessaN said:
Is there any easier way to solve then doing all of that?

Yes, taking the ratio of the kinetic energies. Everything apart from ##1.3^2 = 1.69## will cancel.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: VanessaN

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K