Plot Mesh Tally with MCNP - Help request from Carla

  • Thread starter Thread starter carlepy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mcnp Plot
AI Thread Summary
To plot a mesh tally in MCNPX, users must first utilize the gridconv tool to create a data file, which can then be plotted using Tecplot. The discussion highlights a user's difficulty in plotting their mesh tally and seeks assistance. Another participant advises starting a new thread for unrelated questions to maintain clarity. The importance of providing detailed information about previous attempts when asking for help is emphasized. Clear communication and proper forum etiquette are crucial for effective assistance.
carlepy
Messages
1
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
mcnp mesh tally plot help
hi dears

I am trying to plot my mesh tally with no success.
Try it on vised (no tally no plot) and on promt (see photo)...
if anyone can give an insight is highly appreciated.

tks
Carla
error.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Dear Carla
Mesh tally in MCNPX or higher versions are plotted using the gridconv first to make a dat file of your input. Then you must use Tecplot to be able to plot your mesh tally.
 
HII I HOPE YOU ARE DOING WELL,
please can you help me i have a question.
is tally mech defined in the MCNPX platform?
 
QERQOURI assiya said:
HII I HOPE YOU ARE DOING WELL,
please can you help me i have a question.
is tally mech defined in the MCNPX platform?
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Please start a new thread with your new question, instead of adding it onto the end of this 2-year-old thread. When you start the new thread, include more information on what you know so far and what you have tried. Thank you.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
836
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top