Plutonium - the last ironic trace of civilization?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trace
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential remnants of human civilization that may survive geological timescales, particularly focusing on materials like plutonium and other artifacts. Participants explore various forms of evidence that could indicate past civilizations on Earth or other planets, considering both natural and artificial markers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that plutonium, due to its long half-life, could be a lasting trace of civilization, especially if it were to be used in asteroid deflection or exploration.
  • Others express skepticism about the detectability of plutonium from light years away, noting a lack of mathematical backing for their doubts.
  • There are claims that unusual metal deposits could serve as evidence of past civilizations, with some arguing that recognizable engineering structures may persist despite erosion.
  • One participant mentions that while many iron-based constructions would not last long, brass statues could endure for over 10,000 years.
  • Discussion includes the idea that satellites in orbit could remain detectable indicators of civilization, although some note that atmospheric drag affects lower orbits.
  • Another point raised is the potential for unusual isotopic mixes resulting from plutonium decay to serve as long-lasting evidence of human activity.
  • Concerns are expressed about the longevity of satellites and the impact of interplanetary dust and solar wind on their detectability over millions of years.
  • Participants debate the significance of radio waves broadcasted by humanity, with some asserting that they fade quickly and are unlikely to be detectable at great distances.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on what remnants of civilization might survive and how detectable they would be. There is no consensus on the effectiveness of plutonium or other materials as lasting evidence, nor on the longevity of satellites or radio signals.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on assumptions about geological processes and the durability of materials over time. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the detectability of various artifacts and the conditions affecting their longevity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring topics in archaeology, planetary science, and the long-term impacts of human activity on Earth and beyond.

cph
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
At least 3 million years are required to form a geological strata (of say 7 ft?). What

remanents of a culture might survive? Plastic pieces; or nothing at all? Our world has

hundreds of tons of plutonium; plus all reactors forming plutonium. The halve life of

plutonium is very long; so it would survive on our planet, and in our broader stellar system

if for example we diverted an asteroid by nuclear warhead means. Likewise for exploration of

terrestrial planets of habitat zone of another stellar system, might the only trace of

civilization be that of plutonium? Stars form in multiple; so therefore our Sun has sister

stellar systems, very close, and ascertainable via dedicated infrared telescope detection of

'cold' gas giants. In addition to spectroscopic detection of oxygen (sign of photosynthesis)

in the atmosphere, might search for plutonium be of interest?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I strongly doubt that enough plutonium can be generated to be detected from many light years away, but I don't have the math to back it up.
 
Layers of crushed automobiles will be our fossils is what I've heard tossed around, sounds pretty accurate to me.
 
Wouldn't unusual deposits of metals in plsces where they would not naturally occur would be evidence of a civilisation having previously been on a planet. I think that this would probably be the final clue to our existence.
 
There was an article in scientific american some maybe 3 years ago about what would be left from our civilization if it would stop today. Most iron based constructions (including sky scrapers, automobiles) wouldn't last very long. Brass statues would last for more than 10000 years if I remember correctly.
Pu 239 has a half life time of 29000years, so, at least on astronomical orders (millions of years) it would disappear pretty soon.
 
Plenty of places that could be easily recognized as being created by civilization. Think about centers of large cities - even after millions years, when they will be leveled by the erosion, it would be obvious that combination of materials/minerals present in the place is not natural. Then, just like we see fossils, many of objects we use would get fossilized this way or another. There are many large scale engineering objects, so it is likely that some will be recognizable after many years - not because they will be still standing, but because we shaped the ground using rulers, and straight lines are not something that happens frequently in nature.
 
Also satellites in orbit would essentially stay in orbit forever. Hence another indicator of past civilization. Just as we easily see satellites from ground, so optical detection, from near space, of reflected light would indicate vanished civilizations, indefinitely into the future.
 
cph said:
Also satellites in orbit would essentially stay in orbit forever.

It depends on how high the orbit is. No idea about geostationary, but those at few hundred kilometers are falling down because of the atmospheric drag. Yes, atmospheric. Very thin, dense enough to slow them down.
 
The result of the decay of the plutonium would be an unusual isotopic mix of uranium with a little neptunium in there also, that would be good evidence lasting for long enough! A resource of U-235 for the distant future...?
 
  • #10
Borek said:
It depends on how high the orbit is. No idea about geostationary, but those at few hundred kilometers are falling down because of the atmospheric drag. Yes, atmospheric. Very thin, dense enough to slow them down.

Just to give some perspective, the expected lifetime of KEO, which will be in a 1800 km orbit, is 50 000 years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KEO. For geostationary orbits, the atmosphere will probably be negligible, but gravitational perturbations from the Moon and Sun, solar pressure, and interactions with the magnetic field will change the orbit, possibly causing re-entry or sending the sat into space.

P.S. I remember reading about KEO as a kid, and even at the time the launch date had been pushed back a few times. It's very surprising and saddening to know that the sat may never launch.
 
  • #11
The two LAGEOS satellites are expected to remain in orbit for about 8.4 million years. Today they are (intentionally) very easy to find--they are studded all over with corner reflectors. These mirrors and the weight of the satellites allow for extremely precise distance measurements from the Earth's surface. (Today GPS satellites allow for even more precise measurements, but the techniques used were not developed at the time the LAGEOS satellites were launched.)

I suppose in a few million years interplanetary dust and the solar wind will have deteriorated the corner reflectors, and there is always the chance of running into a small (or large) comet or asteroid. So I vote for the lunar landing sites as the most enduring (findable) relic of our civilization. (The Pioneer and Voyager spacecraft are going to be pretty hard to find in ten million years or so, even given precise trajectory data. ;-)
 
  • #12
What about the radio waves we've been broadcasting for more than a century?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Radio signals fade to undetectable levels after traveling a few light years. My money is on the lunar laser ranging mirrors left on the surface of the moon.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
471
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K