1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Polarisation of photons exiting a birefringent crystal

  1. Aug 9, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    The problem is taken from A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics by Townsend, and is stated as follows:
    The answer given in the back of the book is 0.12, though I have not managed to get this result.

    2. Relevant equations

    Classically, light traveling through a crystal of refractive index [itex]n[/itex] will pick up the phase factor
    [itex]\phi = \dfrac{n \omega z}{c} = \dfrac{2\pi n}{\lambda_0}[/itex]

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I couldn't see any obvious way of doing this with Bra-ket notation, which is odd since most of the preceding two chapters were spent building this notation up gradually; I'm probably missing something obvious. Instead I tried to calculate the intensity of right-polarised light the crystal as a proportion of the overall intensity. This classical result should equate with the probability of an individual photon being right-polarised.

    The incoming light is angled 45° to the x & y-axes so the respective components of the electric field are given as
    E_x &= E_0 \cos (\dfrac{2\pi n_x \Delta z}{\lambda_0} - \omega t) \\
    E_y &= E_0 \cos (\dfrac{2\pi n_y \Delta z}{\lambda_0} - \omega t)
    where [itex]\Delta z[/itex] is the thickness of the crystal. This gives the overall phase difference between the two components upon exiting the crystal as
    [itex]\Delta \phi = \dfrac{2\pi \Delta z}{\lambda_0} (n_x - n_y)[/itex]

    Now, my reasoning gets a touch hand-wavey here. Right-polarised light is where [itex]\Delta \phi = \frac{\pi}{2}[/itex], and the sine function happens to be a maximum for this phase difference, so I'd expect [itex]\sin \Delta \phi[/itex] to give the component of right-polarised light(?). So, the proportional intensity of right-polarised light should be given by [itex]\sin^2 \Delta\phi[/itex].
    But, plugging in the numbers in the question gives the proportion/probability 0.58, which is way off from the value of 0.12 given as a solution. So I suspect I have misunderstood something crucial about this question.
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 9, 2013 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Hello, Badgerinapie. Welcome to PF!

    You mentioned bra-ket notation. I think that would be a nice way to work it out. Can you state what you would use for the ket representing x-polarization? y-polarization? polarization at 45o to the x and y axes? Right hand polarization?
  4. Aug 10, 2013 #3
    Thank you :)

    Sure, I'd represent x and y polarisations with [itex]\left|x\right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left|y\right\rangle[/itex] respectively. Thus, for linear polarisation at some angle [itex]\phi[/itex] to the x-axis I'd write [itex]\left|\psi\right\rangle = \cos\phi \left|x\right\rangle + \sin\phi \left|y\right\rangle[/itex]. Setting [itex]\phi=45°[/itex] gives [itex]\left|\psi\right\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\left|x\right\rangle + \left|y\right\rangle\right)[/itex]. The matrix representation of this with [itex]\left|x\right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left|y\right\rangle[/itex] as the basis vectors would then be [itex]\left|\psi\right\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}[/itex].

    For right polarisation I'd use [itex]\left|R\right\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\left|x\right\rangle + i\left|y\right\rangle\right)[/itex]. Or, in matrix representation we'd write [itex]\left|R\right\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ i \end{pmatrix}[/itex]. The corresponding Bra is then written as [itex]\left\langle R\right| = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}1 & -i \end{pmatrix}[/itex].

    I take it that we have to create some modified wavefunction, [itex]\left|\psi\prime\right\rangle[/itex] say, to account for the physical effect of the crystal, and then do [itex]|\left\langle R | \psi\prime\right\rangle|^2[/itex] to get the probabilty(?).

  5. Aug 10, 2013 #4


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Ok, that all looks good!

    Yes, that's exactly right. The effect of the crystal is to increase the phase angle of the ##|x\rangle## component relative to the ##|y\rangle## component by ##\Delta \phi##. Since the state going into the crystal is [itex]\left|\psi\right\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\left|x\right\rangle + \left|y\right\rangle\right)[/itex], how would you modify this state to include a phase shift angle of ##\Delta \phi## of the ##|x\rangle## component relative to the ##|y\rangle## component?
  6. Aug 12, 2013 #5
    Okay I think I've got it, thank you! I modified the wavefunction with a complex phase factor on each term as in [itex]\left|\psi\right\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left(e^{i\phi_x} \left|x\right\rangle + e^{i\phi_y} \left|y\right\rangle\right) = \dfrac{e^{i\phi_x}}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\left|x\right\rangle + e^{i\Delta\phi} \left|y\right\rangle\right)[/itex] where [itex]\Delta\phi = \phi_y - \phi_x[/itex]. Now I could ignore the phase term [itex]e^{\phi_x}[/itex] here as it'll come out when I take the magnitude squared, but I'll leave it in for rigour's sake while I'm still getting to grips with the basics.

    So, the inner product becomes:
    [itex]\left\langle R|\psi\right\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}1 & -i\end{pmatrix} \dfrac{e^{i\phi_x}}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix}1 \\ e^{i\Delta\phi} \end{pmatrix} = \dfrac{e^{i\phi_x}}{2} \left(1 + e^{i(\Delta\phi - \frac{\pi}{2})}\right)[/itex].
    Multiplying this by its complex conjugate gives:
    [itex]\left|\left\langle R|\psi\right\rangle\right|^2 = \dfrac{e^{i\phi_x}}{2} \left(1 + e^{i(\Delta\phi - \frac{\pi}{2})}\right) \dfrac{e^{-i\phi_x}}{2} \left(1 + e^{-i(\Delta\phi - \frac{\pi}{2})}\right) = \dfrac{1}{2}\left(1 + \sin\Delta\phi\right)[/itex].
    Plugging [itex]\Delta\phi = \dfrac{2\pi\Delta z}{\lambda_0} \left(n_y - n_x\right)[/itex] into the above expression gives the value 0.12, as stated in the back of the book.

    Thank you TSny, your help is much appreciated! :)
  7. Aug 12, 2013 #6


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Yes, nice work.

    It might be worthwhile to point out that you don't really need to use the matrix representations of the states. You can stick with the abstract bra and ket notation.

    [itex]\left\langle R|\psi\right\rangle = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\langle x| - i \langle y|) \dfrac{e^{i\phi_x}}{\sqrt{2}} \left(\left|x\right\rangle + e^{i\Delta\phi} \left|y\right\rangle\right) = \dfrac{e^{i\phi_x}}{2} \left(1 + e^{i(\Delta\phi - \frac{\pi}{2})}\right)[/itex] using the orhonormality of the x and y kets.

    (But I used the matrix representation also when I first worked it out.)
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Polarisation of photons exiting a birefringent crystal
  1. Polarisation of Light (Replies: 3)