Polarization Eraser & Entanglement

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Messages
8,500
Reaction score
2,136
Following Fig. 1 in the following paper:

Eberly (2002): Bell inequalities and quantum mechanics

In an ideal case (this is far from easy to do): Send an incident beam from one side of entangled photon pairs into a beamsplitter, and then recombine the outputs back into a single stream. Let's call the outputs of the beamsplitter as X and Y, where X and Y are orthogonal. The theory is that the recombined stream X+Y will still evidence entanglement, as the polarization has been erased.

In the next step, let's do the same thing for both Alice and Bob. You end up with 4 outputs from the 2 beamsplitters, which are before erasure:

Alice X
Alice Y
Bob X
Bob Y

1. So if you take the recombined streams (Alice X + Alice Y) and (Bob X + Bob Y), they are still entangled. As far as I know, this experiment (as described by Eberly in more complex versions) has not been performed. Does anyone know of a reference on this?

2. Here is a strange one: Alice X and Bob X are identical streams, as are Alice Y and Bob Y. I believe that theory would say that (Alice X + Bob Y) and (Bob X + Alice Y), if they could be combined, would be entangled! Were that true, it would indicate that the probability waves are "real" even though the observable properties apparently are not. Any thoughts? Has anyone seen anything on this?
 

Attachments

  • PolarizationEraser.jpg
    PolarizationEraser.jpg
    6.1 KB · Views: 541
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably no one has bothered with experiment described by Eberly because his derivation is erroneous as explained by Ryff here http://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.1724"
 
Last edited by a moderator: