Are the poles of a broken magnet always the same?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CompuChip
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Broken Magnet Poles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of an annular permanent magnet, specifically a neodymium magnet, that broke into two pieces, resulting in each piece exhibiting similar poles. The participants concluded that the broken halves would repel each other due to the alignment of their magnetic poles, which remained consistent after the break. Theoretical reasoning suggests that the original magnet had a uniform magnetic field, leading to the observed behavior. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding magnetic polarity in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic polarity and field configurations
  • Familiarity with permanent magnets, specifically neodymium magnets
  • Basic knowledge of magnetic field visualization techniques
  • Concept of symmetry in magnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of neodymium magnets and their applications
  • Learn about magnetic field visualization techniques using iron filings
  • Explore the effects of physical alterations on magnetic properties
  • Study the principles of magnetic symmetry and its implications in magnet design
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, materials scientists, and engineers interested in magnetism and its practical applications will benefit from this discussion.

CompuChip
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
4,305
Reaction score
49
Hi,

Recently I came across an annular permanent magnet (round magnet with a hole in it) which had fallen and broken in half, effectively forming two horse-shoe magnets. I noticed that the two halves had similar poles:
Code:
|---------- S     S--------
|                         |
|                         |
|                         |
|                         |
|                         |
|---- N         N---------|    

(top view)

Therefore it was impossible to put it back together because the two halves repulsed each other one way, and the way the attracted they didn't fit together anymore because it was - of course - not a perfect cut.

I was wondering whether this is a coincidence. Since these magnets are apparently quite expensive it was a bit unpractical to repeat the experiment, but something tells me that one would get this situation every time although I was unable to explain this theoretically.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure you did not turn one magnet around? That looks line an unusual field configuration for your description of the magnet.
 
Yes, it broke into two uneven pieces. Each of them was about half of the size of the original but the pieces clearly only fitted together in one way.
 
What was the field direction (that is, where were the poles) of the ring-shaped magnet before it broke?
 
Based on symmetry (and a little intuition) I expect that the field looked like this
antigravitywg145.gif

with a north pole at the top and the south pole at the bottom or vice versa - I don't think which option is relevant.

FWIW, I think it was a neodymium magnet like this one
neodymium-iron-boron-ring-magnet-ndfeb-16882-2518093.jpg


I also tried imagining the magnet is first cut once, giving rise to something like this:
pole.gif

but if you then cut it at the top as well I would expect two halves that attract (ie in the left half a south pole is created at the top) - apparently in the case that I observed the poles of one part got flipped.

I'm also not sure whether such a reasoning would work for a violent event like dropping it from a table.
 
Last edited:
It is likely it retained the same polarity after you broke it also viz North pole at the top and South pole at the bottom. So if you bring the broken ends together they would repel (the north at top repelling the north at top of the other one and south at bottom repelling the south at bottom of the other one) but if you flipped one of them over they would attract (north at top of one attracts south at top of other and south at bottom of one attracts north at bottom of the other).
 
Hmm, that is an interesting possibility which I didn't consider, physwizard. I would have thought that after breaking the ring in half you would effectively get two horse-shoe magnets.

I guess I could easily find out myself with a piece of paper and some iron filing... maybe I should have done that in the first place :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
663
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K