Polygons can be designated as N-gons. What about vertices?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter probiner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polygons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the terminology used in 3D modeling for polygons and vertices, specifically the use of N-gon to refer to polygons with more than four sides. Participants explore the idea of a suitable suffix for vertices based on their degree or valence, with suggestions like "4-valent vertex" and "nth degree vertex." The conversation also touches on the need for concise and rational nomenclature, with various playful suffixes proposed, such as N-tex and N-link. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of clear terminology in mathematical and modeling contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 3D modeling concepts, particularly polygons and vertices.
  • Familiarity with terms like N-gon, tris, and quads.
  • Basic knowledge of graph theory, especially vertex degree and valence.
  • Awareness of mathematical nomenclature and its applications in modeling.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of vertex valence in graph theory.
  • Explore the implications of polygonal nomenclature in 3D modeling software.
  • Investigate existing mathematical suffixes and their applications in geometry.
  • Learn about the relationship between polygons and their duals in computational geometry.
USEFUL FOR

3D modelers, computer graphics developers, mathematicians, and anyone interested in the intersection of geometry and modeling terminology.

probiner
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi

In 3D modeling world, people refer to 3 sided polygons as tris, 4 sided as quads and >4 sides polygons as N-gons. Now, if I understand right, actually N-Gon refers to any. So instead of saying Triangle or Quadrilateral, I can say 3-gon and 4-gon and it would be correct, right?

What about vertices? What suffix is used or it would make sense to be used to refer to a vertex's degree/valence?

N-what.png


Cheers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey probiner and welcome to the forums.

I haven't head of a postfix term for what you are describing, but then again I don't know much graph theory.

As a guess though maybe something like 4-valent vertex?
 
Hi :)
Well that's a bit like saying 4-point polygon. It's long and doesn't fit well a dissertation, I think (!), where you refer to many of these like a simple quantity.

My wishful thinking was something like a -tex suffix (for example) and then I could go on and say "one 6-tex can be converted into two 5-tex", "and by the way the same concepts that apply to a 5-gon, apply to a 5-tex because they are duals; different elements (vertex and polygon), but same valence" and so on... and then introduce some simple operations where you add and subtract values based on polygons and vertices valence number to get the sum. Like: one 5-gon & one 6-tex & four 3-tex = -1 area.

I'm also open to rational proposes for a suffix, if it's not in the books of Math, I can go along with an invented one, given that's it's not totally silly :)
Any ideas?

Thanks for reading
 
Last edited:
probiner said:
What about vertices? What suffix is used or it would make
sense to be used to refer to a vertex's degree/valence?

Why wouldn't you just refer to a vertex as having an nth degree?
A 2nd degree vertex, a 3rd degree vertex, and so on...



And just let bi-gons be bi-gons.
 
It has to be shorter =P I want a name that is easy, short, and that is rational or feels correct.

These vertices, especially the 3 degree and the 5 degree are under the umbrella of "Poles"
And are designated of E an N by this author (i'm the poster but it's a transcript): http://www.lightwiki.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=22

I, on the hand, am a bit more abstract and less practical while I try to see connections and patters (underlying concepts) using a more open and less focused approach: http://forums.newtek.com/showpost.php?p=894021&postcount=24

The subject is the same, although I now need a feel for a more fit nomenclature and E and N don't fit at all. And I don't understand where the mathematical notion of "Pole" fits here at all. So it doesn't even look rational.

So here's a set of silly options:

N-tex
N-link
N-string
...

Any other?

Thanks for reading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K