A polygon is rolling down a hill

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a regular polygon rolling down a frictional ramp at an angle. The original poster defines various parameters related to the polygon's motion, including angular velocities and moments of inertia, and presents equations governing the conservation of angular momentum and kinetic energy during impacts with the ramp.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the recurrence relation for angular velocities and suggest alternative algebraic approaches, such as using half angles. There is also consideration of the polygon's loss of contact with the ramp during acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights and suggestions for simplifying the equations. Some have identified the potential for a linear recurrence relation and are discussing the implications of the polygon's motion and contact with the ramp.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of constraints related to the polygon's motion, including the conditions under which it may lose contact with the ramp. The discussion reflects on the complexities of the problem, including the need for further exploration of the forces involved.

etotheipi
Homework Statement
A polygon is rolling down a hill, find the angular velocity after the ##N^{\text{th}}## impact with the hill (assume polygon has slight concavity)
Relevant Equations
N/A
An ##n##-sided regular polygon is rolling down a frictional ramp at angle ##\theta## to the horizontal. I define ##\beta := \frac{2\pi}{n}## as the angle at the top of each of the ##n## isosceles triangles that make up the polygon. Let ##\omega_{k, 1}## be the angular velocity just after the ##k^{\text{th}}## impact with the ramp, and ##\omega_{k, 2}## be the angular velocity just before the ##(k+1)^{\text{th}}## impact with the ramp. Finally, let the moment of inertia about the centre of the polygon be ##I_{cm} := pmr^2## and the moment of inertia about one of the vertices be ##I_{v} := qmr^2##, where ##r## is the distance from the centre to a vertex. The side length of the polygon is ##l = \sqrt{2r^2(1-\cos{\beta})}##.

At the ##(k+1)^\text{th}## impact, we conserve angular momentum about the point on the ground with which the next vertex is just about to come into contact,$$I_{cm} \omega_{k,2} + mr^2 \omega_{k,2} \cos{\beta} = I_v \omega_{k+1, 1}$$ $$(p+\cos{\beta})\omega_{k,2} = q\omega_{1, k+1}$$Between impacts, the polygon gains kinetic energy ##mgl\sin{\theta}## due to the decrease in height of its centre of mass, so we can also say that$$\frac{1}{2}I_v \omega_{k, 1}^2 + mgl\sin{\theta} = \frac{1}{2}I_v \omega_{k,2}^2$$ $$\omega_{k,2}^2 - \omega_{k, 1}^2 = \frac{2g\sin{\theta}}{qr}\sqrt{2(1-\cos{\beta})}$$I put this into the first equation to obtain$$\omega_{k+1,1} = \frac{p +\cos{\beta}}{q} \sqrt{\omega_{k,1}^2 + \frac{2g\sin{\theta}}{qr}\sqrt{2(1-\cos{\beta})}}$$I wondered if anyone can help me to solve this recurrence relation? Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
etotheipi said:
obtain$$\omega_{k+1,1} = \frac{p +\cos{\beta}}{q} \sqrt{\omega_{k,1}^2 + \frac{2g\sin{\theta}}{qr}\sqrt{2(1-\cos{\beta})}}$$I wondered if anyone can help me to solve this recurrence relation? Thanks
It would have been easier algebra to have worked in terms of the half angle.
Isn't your last equation of the form ##x_{k+1}=Ax_k+B##?

Of course, if it is accelerating then at some point it will lose contact before the next impact.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
haruspex said:
It would have been easier algebra to have worked in terms of the half angle.
Isn't your last equation of the form ##x_{k+1}=Ax_k+B##?

Ah you're right, I could just let ##u_k := \omega_k^2## and then it is just a linear recurrence relation. Also a good idea about the half angle, I think the nested root would become ##2\sin{\frac{1}{2}\beta}##, for one thing.

haruspex said:
Of course, if it is accelerating then at some point it will lose contact before the next impact.

I hadn't thought of that! Loosely, I imagine should just be a case of writing the Newton II equation for circular motion of the centre of mass of the polygon about the point of contact (in terms of the normal force and the weight), and letting ##N## be zero to see when weight can no longer provide the necessary centripetal acceleration. Is that also what you had in mind?

I'll try to tie off these loose ends tomorrow, because it's getting a little late. Thanks for the help!
 
haruspex said:
It would have been easier algebra to have worked in terms of the half angle.
Isn't your last equation of the form ##x_{k+1}=Ax_k+B##?
Oh, right. Square both sides. Don't work with velocity. Work with energy.

Edit: I see that I am late to the party.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K