Polynomial sequence uniformly convergent on annulus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on finding a polynomial sequence \( p_j(z) \) that converges uniformly to \( \frac{1}{z} \) on the annulus defined by \( 1 < |z| < 2 \). It is established that the Laurent series for \( \frac{1}{z} \) converges uniformly within this compact set, while the Taylor series cannot converge on the entire annulus due to the singularity at \( z = 0 \). The challenge of finding a polynomial sequence converging to \( \sin\left(\frac{1}{z^2}\right) \) is also addressed, highlighting the divergence caused by the function's behavior near the singularity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laurent series and their properties
  • Knowledge of Taylor series and their convergence criteria
  • Familiarity with complex analysis concepts, particularly singularities
  • Basic proficiency in polynomial functions and rational functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Laurent series in complex analysis
  • Research the conditions for uniform convergence of series
  • Explore the implications of singularities on series convergence
  • Learn about the relationship between rational functions and polynomial sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the convergence properties of sequences and series in the context of analytic functions.

QuantumLuck
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can we find a sequence, say p_j(z) such that p_j ---> 1/z uniformly for z is an element of an annulus between 1 and 2, that is 1 < abs(z) < 2?

Then i am asked to do the same thing but for p_j ---> sin(1/z^2).

Homework Equations


Not too sure about this, maybe Taylor series/Laurent series expansions.

The Attempt at a Solution


So while I have no definite path yet set on proving this what I do have are a few thoughts. On this annulus 1/z is analytic because the point z = 0 is not contained. Also, we can write a Taylor/Laurent series expansion for 1/z.

However, I do not believe that we are able to do the same thing for the sin sequence because we end up with a larger numerator term which blows up and cause the series to diverge. However, against z = 0 is not contained here so maybe that is false? Am I thinking about this correctly or am I a fool?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Laurent-series will converge uniformly in both cases, because \{z,1\le|z|\le 2\} is compact. It will not be possible to find a taylor series that converges on the entire annulus, because the radius of convergence can only extend to the origin, where there is a singularity.
 
so as long as the function you are tying to converge to is defined over the entire annulus any sequence which approaches that function (the Laurent series of that function) will converge uniformly? and this is relevant to my question because i am seeking a polynomial sequence which is just the Laurent series right?

also: in an unrelated question; what do you mean the radius of converge can extend only to the origin?
 
QuantumLuck said:
so as long as the function you are tying to converge to is defined over the entire annulus any sequence which approaches that function (the Laurent series of that function) will converge uniformly?

This is certainly true for the Laurent series, but not for all series I think.

and this is relevant to my question because i am seeking a polynomial sequence which is just the Laurent series right?

The terms of the Laurent series are polynomials in z, z^-1, so they are not "polynomials" in the usual sense, but rational functions.
If you are looking for a series of polynomials (only in z), then the only candidate is the Taylor series, which can't converge on the entire annulus, see below.

also: in an unrelated question; what do you mean the radius of converge can extend only to the origin?

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_convergence#Radii_of_convergence_in_complex_analysis":
The radius of convergence of a power series f centered on a point a is equal to the distance from a to the nearest point where f cannot be defined in a way that makes it holomorphic.

Where "the nearest point where f cannot be defined in a way that makes it holomorphic" is basically the nearest singularity. Both 1/z and sin(1/z^2) have one singularity at the origin.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K