MHB Polynomials in n indeterminates and UFDs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
In the introduction to Chapter 1 of his book "Introduction to Plane Algebraic Curves", Ernst Kunz states that the polynomial ring $$K[ X_1, X_2, \ ... \ ... \ X_n]$$ over a field $$K$$ is a unique factorization domain ... ... but he does not prove this fact ...

Can someone demonstrate a proof of this proposition ... or point me to a text or online notes that contain a proof ...

Help will be appreciated ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
In the introduction to Chapter 1 of his book "Introduction to Plane Algebraic Curves", Ernst Kunz states that the polynomial ring $$K[ X_1, X_2, \ ... \ ... \ X_n]$$ over a field $$K$$ is a unique factorization domain ... ... but he does not prove this fact ...

Can someone demonstrate a proof of this proposition ... or point me to a text or online notes that contain a proof ...

Help will be appreciated ... ...

Peter
There is a theorem that if $R$ is a UFD then so is $R[X]$. Your result then follows by induction on the number of indeterminates, because $K[ X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n] = (K[ X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_{n-1}])[X_n]$.

There is a discussion and proof of that theorem here.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top