Pos. et neg. particle in circ. motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter henxan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Particle
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two particles, one negatively charged and the other positively charged, both of mass m, moving in circular motion. The participants explore the differences in scale between electric and magnetic forces acting on these particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the electric field and its inverse square relationship, while also drawing parallels to a two-wire problem to understand the magnetic field. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the conclusions related to the order of magnitude differences influenced by physical constants like myu_0 and epsilon_0.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationship between electric and magnetic forces, noting that the magnetic force's dependence on particle speeds is significant, especially at low velocities. There is an acknowledgment of the need for calculations to clarify the relationships discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential complexity introduced by relativistic effects at speeds approaching a significant fraction of the speed of light, indicating a need for careful consideration in their calculations.

henxan
Messages
46
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



You have two particles, both mass m.
One particle negative (-q) and other (+q).
Thay are going in a circular motion, velocity v or angular velocity (omega).
What is the difference in scale of the electric and magnetic attraction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the Homework forum. Why don't you tell us your thoughts first?
 
Well, straightforward you've got the square decreasing electric field. But, concerning the magnetic field:
This is actually a parallel problem to a two wire problem. Two wires separated with a distance D, carrying a current in the same direction. This is, because, if you take a snapshot of the system, it is two particles, traveling in opposite direction, with opposite charge.

Using vector potential you would also get a B which decreases with the square of r. So, my conclusion is, the order of magnitude of difference would be related to myu_0 and epsilon_0

Is this correct? Or have I messed around and gotten a factor difference somewhere? :/
 
> So, my conclusion is, the order of magnitude of difference would be related to myu_0 and epsilon_0

Very good. But the magnetic force will also depend on the speeds of the particles. For low speeds, the magnetic force is very low compared to the electric force. You can get a rough idea by treating the moving charges as tiny currents and using Biot-Savart’s law. The speeds will then come in via the current.
 
Shooting star said:
> So, my conclusion is, the order of magnitude of difference would be related to myu_0 and epsilon_0

Very good. But the magnetic force will also depend on the speeds of the particles. For low speeds, the magnetic force is very low compared to the electric force. You can get a rough idea by treating the moving charges as tiny currents and using Biot-Savart’s law. The speeds will then come in via the current.

LOL.. I actually forget to mention that that the speed of the particle also mattered. So it is correct to say that epsilon_0 vs speed*myu_0?.. Thanks for the reply.. I have to admit this question came as a result to the fact that i didnt bother to actually calculate the forces.. Ill set ut the equations and figure this out later.. And it ought to be straight forward unless one steps into the relative roam v>10% of lightspeed :)..
 
Post your calculations. It'll involve [itex]v^2[/itex]. Don't go relative for now.
 
LOL.. I wont.. Ill do it tomorrow or sunday.. I think ill set the mass as unknown, and calculate the two forces first.. Thanks..
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K