Position of the principal points of a telephoto lens system

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the position of the cardinal points of a telephoto lens system, specifically with a focal length of 200mm. The participant notes that while textbooks indicate principal points are typically located within or near the lens system, for telephoto lenses, both principal points should be positioned in the object space. The conversation also addresses the complexities introduced by the combination of positive and negative focal lengths in telephoto designs, leading to confusion about the correct approach for locating these points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of telephoto lens systems and their configurations
  • Knowledge of cardinal points in optics
  • Familiarity with ray tracing techniques
  • Basic principles of trigonometry as applied to optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of cardinal points in optical systems
  • Learn about ray tracing methods for locating principal planes
  • Study the effects of lens aberrations in telephoto designs
  • Explore practical experiments for measuring focal lengths and principal points
USEFUL FOR

Optics students, optical engineers, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of telephoto lens systems will benefit from this discussion.

MissScience33
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
for a lab I need to determine the position of the cardinal points of a telephoto lens. The focal points were determined experimentally, and the focal length given on the lens is 200mm. The principal points should be determined with f=PF.

In all the textbooks, the principal points mostly find themselves back within the thick lens/lens system, or very close to it if it is for instance a meniscus lens. For a telephoto, both principal points should find themselves back in the object space.

But if I draw the principal points such that the focal lengths go from the focal points towards the lens, the rear principal point finds itself closer to the front focal point, and the front principal point is closer to the rear focal point. I think this is strange since the focal length should then be the shorter distance between the (in my sketch) rear, respectively front focal point and the front, respectively rear principal point.

I was wondering if due to the fact that in a telephoto, there are two lenses(in theory, in practice there are apparently more to prevent aberrations I think), with a negative and a positive focal length, in order to find the principal points, one should go in the same direction, towards the object space for both? Or maybe in opposite directions, but not towards the lens? This seems slightly weird to me if I understand the theory correctly, but maybe I missed something with the signs of the radii of curvature, or the focal lengths?

Or is there maybe a problem with the positions of the focal points?

Thanks for any input!
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
MissScience33 said:
Hi everyone,
for a lab I need to determine the position of the cardinal points of a telephoto lens. The focal points were determined experimentally, and the focal length given on the lens is 200mm. The principal points should be determined with f=PF.

In all the textbooks, the principal points mostly find themselves back within the thick lens/lens system, or very close to it if it is for instance a meniscus lens. For a telephoto, both principal points should find themselves back in the object space.

But if I draw the principal points such that the focal lengths go from the focal points towards the lens, the rear principal point finds itself closer to the front focal point, and the front principal point is closer to the rear focal point. I think this is strange since the focal length should then be the shorter distance between the (in my sketch) rear, respectively front focal point and the front, respectively rear principal point.

I was wondering if due to the fact that in a telephoto, there are two lenses(in theory, in practice there are apparently more to prevent aberrations I think), with a negative and a positive focal length, in order to find the principal points, one should go in the same direction, towards the object space for both? Or maybe in opposite directions, but not towards the lens? This seems slightly weird to me if I understand the theory correctly, but maybe I missed something with the signs of the radii of curvature, or the focal lengths?

Or is there maybe a problem with the positions of the focal points?

Thanks for any input!
I don't understand what you are trying to do- is this a ray tracing exercise, or are you trying to locate planes for an actual lens sitting on a bench?
 
Andy Resnick said:
I don't understand what you are trying to do- is this a ray tracing exercise, or are you trying to locate planes for an actual lens sitting on a bench?
I'm trying to locate the planes for a real telephoto lens.
 
MissScience33 said:
I'm trying to locate the planes for a real telephoto lens.
Hmmm... I think it's a little tricky.

Try aiming a raw laser beam parallel to the optical axis, laterally displaced by a given distance and then measure the angle the beam when it emerges from the lens. I think you can then use trig to locate the rear plane, defined where the ray emerging from the lens appears to have crossed the rear principal plane at the same distance from the axis that the ray entered the lens. Reverse the setup to locate the front principle plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K