Position operator is it communitative

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the position operator in the context of the Schrödinger Wave equation and its commutativity properties. Participants are exploring whether the position operator is commutative, particularly in relation to other operators such as momentum and the Hamiltonian.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the conditions under which the position operator may or may not commute with other operators. Questions are raised about the specific operators involved in the commutation relation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to clarify which operators are being compared for commutativity. There is no explicit consensus yet on the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information regarding the specific operator with which the position operator is being compared, which is essential for addressing the question of commutativity.

zimbabwe
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I was asked to show how the position operator is not communitative in the Shrodinger Wave equation. I thought it was as it is simply mulitplication

[x]=integral from negative to positive infinite over f*(x,t) x f(x,t) dx

Can anyone help shed some light on this. I may have misunderstood the question
[tex]\hat{x}=\int^{-\infty}_{+\infty}\Psi^{*}\left(x,t\right) x \Psi\left(x,t\right) dx[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In momentum space [itex]x[/itex] is not commutative, because there

[tex] \hat{x}=i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial p}[/tex]

So perhaps your professor is inquiring about the wave function in momentum space?
 
Show (that is my guess based on your information, which is rather few):

[tex]x H \neq H x[/tex]

Integrals do not help for not commuting operators.
 
zimbabwe said:
I was asked to show how the position operator is not communitative in the Shrodinger Wave equation. I thought it was as it is simply mulitplication
A single operator can't be commutative or noncommutative on its own. You always have to talk about a pair of operators that commute or don't commute with each other. So the question we have is, the position operator does not commute with what? That's the extra information we need. (White assumed the missing operator was the Hamiltonian; jdwood83 assumed it was momentum...)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K