Positron-electron annihilation in matter

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter seerongo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the dynamics of positron-electron annihilation in matter, particularly focusing on the behavior of energetic positrons as they travel through a medium. Participants explore theoretical aspects, practical implications in applications like PET scanning, and the nature of the annihilation process itself.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a moving positron must lose kinetic energy through ionization or bremsstrahlung before it can annihilate, typically forming positronium and resulting in the emission of two 511 keV photons.
  • Others argue that higher energy positrons may lead to different annihilation outcomes, potentially involving higher energy photons or heavier particles if the kinetic energies are sufficiently high.
  • One participant notes that positrons used in PET scans are of low energy and primarily slow down through ionization before annihilation occurs.
  • Another participant mentions that the annihilation process is characterized by the emission of two 511 keV gamma rays, which is a reliable signature in lower energy situations.
  • There is a question raised about whether the photons produced in the annihilation process carry any charge, to which a participant responds that photons do not possess electric charge.
  • A reference is made to Heitler's work, indicating that the probability of annihilation in flight for a 1-MeV positron is relatively low (about 4%).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which positron annihilation occurs, particularly regarding the role of kinetic energy and the formation of positronium. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the annihilation process.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific definitions and assumptions about kinetic energy thresholds and the nature of positronium. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical or physical details of these processes.

seerongo
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I have seen some seemingly differing statements in various sources about the dynamics of annihilation when the positron has some kinetic energy and is traveling through a medium.

Two sources I've read state or imply that a positron in motion through matter must first lose it's kinetic energy through ionization or bremsstrahlung before it can annihilate with an electron, and even then, only through an intermediate positronium, and will therefore only annihilate with the signature 511 kev photons. Is all this true?

Another source (the Wiki on annihilation) seems to say that annihilations can take place involving higher energy photons or even heavier particles if the kinetic energies are high enough.

So, what really happens with an energetic positron in matter? I'm especially interested in the case of positrons emitted in radioactive decay and the physics behind PET scanning.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Be careful with Wikipedia since it does not have a rigorous control system on the quality of information.

Positrons used in PET are of low energy (keV and low MeV), so they slow down in matter, primarily by ionization. Once they slow down to very low energy, they will combine with an electron (positronium) and then annihilate with the electron, which results in the formation of two 0.511 MeV gamma rays.

15O and 18F, have respective maximum positron energies of about 1,730 keV and 630 keV. Ref: http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q6655.html

See also - http://www.np.ph.bham.ac.uk/pic/physics.htm

Radiation Basics — Beta Particles (negative and positive) and Electrons
http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q6240.html

Other common positron emitters are:
22Na, 65Zn, 68Ga, and 114In.
http://www.ehs.ucsf.edu/Manuals/RSTM/RSTM%20Chap1.htm#2.%20POSITIVE%20BETA%20PARTICLES

Higher energy positrons must be energized in an accelerator. They will not produce heavy particles unless their kinetic energy is on the order of high MeV or GeV.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As usual, you nailed my question. So, it appears that annihilation can occur either after thermal equilibrium or through positronium on the way down. I need to research positronium, that's an interesting phenomenon in itself. In either case, it's always 2 x 511kev in lower energy situations, which certainly explains the reliable and useful signature. Very curious behavior, I wonder what the explanation is for having to come to rest before annihilation.

I know what you mean about Wiki. I always try to "consider the source," but with Wiki, you don't usually know the source.

Thanks for the reply and references.
 
Hi...sorry, this may be a closed topic now, but just wanted to know if the photons formed in this anhilation process carry any charge with them ? cause what will happen to the negative charge of electron and the positive charge of the positron ? they are neutralized for the system as a whole, but charges won't be destroyed rt ?
 
ravisastry said:
Hi...sorry, this may be a closed topic now, but just wanted to know if the photons formed in this anhilation process carry any charge with them ?

Nope, photons do not possesses electric charge. All that matters is that the total charge of the system be the same (zero) before and after annihilation.
 
Heitler "The Quantum Theory of Radiation" Third edition (1954) plots the integrated probability of positron annihilation in flight vs. positron kinetic energy on page 385. For a 1-MeV positron, the integrated probability of annihilation in flight (before stopping) is ~4%.

Bob S
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K