Possible Consequences of Time Travel: A Scientific Perspective

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the theoretical implications of time travel, presenting two primary outcomes: the impossibility of time travel or the potential destruction of the universe. Key arguments include the concept that traveling back in time would increase the universe's mass, leading to catastrophic consequences. Additionally, it emphasizes that the universe operates beyond human perceptions of linear time, suggesting that understanding time requires a multi-dimensional perspective, as proposed by Einstein's Relativity. The conversation also introduces the idea of harmonizing time through concepts like the 13 Moon calendar and chronomancy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Relativity
  • Familiarity with multi-dimensional theories
  • Knowledge of chronomancy and synchronometrics
  • Basic concepts of mass-energy equivalence
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Einstein's Relativity on time travel
  • Study the 13 Moon calendar and its significance in time perception
  • Explore the principles of chronomancy and their applications
  • Investigate the concept of mass-energy equivalence in the context of time travel
USEFUL FOR

Scientists, physicists, philosophers, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of time travel and its implications on the universe.

Eepl
As I see it one of two thing can happen with time travel.

1- Time travel is not possible at all.

2- We time travel and destroy the universe. Here's why,
- The universe has a set mass, and therefore a set gravitational pull. If you go back in time you have just increased the mass of the universe and eventhough it's a small mass it will still change everything.
-And also the atoms that you are made of are were making up somthing else in the past. So the question is then can you have a duplicate copy of matter in the same universe? Or would it destory the duplicate copys of matter then decreasing the mass of the universe.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy cannot be destroyed, so technically, if you went back in time, you would only be transferring your 'mass' (energy). There would be no dupicate copy to destroy.

Though we (humans) view time as linear, the universe does not work upon this principle. So, since you exist now, if you were to go back into time, the universe has already *calculated* your energy into the scheme of it all, so there would be no off-balance reaction.
 
Though we (humans) view time as linear, the universe does not work upon this principle.

Ummm. How do you know that?
 
Einstein's Relativity
 
the work of time travel is a multi-dimensional spiritual challenge

explaining time travel in 3-dimensional terms will never do

realizing super conciousness and hyper-dimensional mind is one way to begin

the law of time extend einstein's theory that time is the fourth dimension, and give an experimental blue print for our research into time- the 13 moon calendar and the dreamspell!

start with traveling form one day to the next- the tools you have to use are the artificial mechanical clock and the gregorian unharmonic calendar- study harmonic 'calendrics' - or synchronometrics and chronomancy- the universe, planets, stars, people, events, and learn more about new concepts of time before time traveling- start with days, then move on to moons- and years- compressing aspects of duration in days, weeks, months, years, into comprehensible geometry that extends from the forth dimension and informs the third dimension is where it's at- first glimpse harmonic time sensibility

learning about the law of time and the dreamspell is good start

13 moon self-study pilot program
http://www.tortuga.com/new/13MSSPP/page01.htm

www.tortuga.com[/URL]

[PLAIN]www.foundationforthelawoftime.com[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
966
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K