Possible energy sources that a lunar base might have as an option

In summary, the conversation discusses potential energy sources for a space base in 50 years, including solar, fusion, fission, and nuclear power. The idea of using radio-nuclide power is also brought up, as well as the possibility of managing the base with robots. The participants agree that solar power would be the best option for a base on the Moon, but a combination of solar and nuclear power could also be ideal. The potential of using Helium-3 as a fuel source is mentioned, but it is unlikely that a second generation fusion reactor would be developed and placed on the Moon in the next 50 years. A compact nuclear power plant could serve as a backup power supply.
  • #1
MonserrateM
4
0
So I am doing research for the different energy sources that might be available for a space base in about fifty years from now. Some of these energy sources would likely be solar, fusion, fission, Nuclear, and I heard of radio - nuclide as well.

What else could be used? In addition, does anyone know much about radio - nuclide power?

In addition, suppose that this base was managed by robots, what kind of energy sources could we possibly use to power these robots?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
If we are talking about the Moon then solar would be your best bet. No atmosphere to disturb it. In 50 years time we might see commercial fusion reactors on the Earth but I doubt we will be able to put them on the Moon (barring big breakthroughs they'll be running D/T as a fuel source as well so lunar He3 doesn't change anything), there are also unique difficulties for fusion in space e.g how to handle waste heat. Nuclear is a possibility if you can build a small, simple nuclear reactor and sending up the nuclear engineers to maintain it isn't an issue for you.

Personally I would say that solar; being an energy harvester all you have to do is build it and off you go. Anything else is going to have to include a supply chain of fuel and would require more people to run it. Plus there's always a risk with things like fusion and fission that they will break and at best you've now got to ship up a new reactor. There's little that would damage solar panels once they were laid down on the Moon.

(Of course the unspoken caveat here is that this lunar base project already has all the necessary funding and technology to do it)
 
  • #3
Radionuclide refers to atoms which undergo radioactive decay.
For example, the fuel for nuclear (fission) power plants are radionuclides.

My opinion is that a combination of solar and nuclear power is ideal for a Moon base.

Fusion is interesting because the Moon may be rich in helium-3, a potentially useful fuel.
 
  • #4
gendou2 said:
Radionuclide refers to atoms which undergo radioactive decay.
For example, the fuel for nuclear (fission) power plants are radionuclides.

My opinion is that a combination of solar and nuclear power is ideal for a Moon base.

Fusion is interesting because the Moon may be rich in helium-3, a potentially useful fuel.

The OP is talking about 50 years from now. Do you think that by that time we will not only have developed a second generation nuclear fusion reactor but figured out how to put it on the Moon?
 
  • #5
Ryan_m_b said:
The OP is talking about 50 years from now. Do you think that by that time we will not only have developed a second generation nuclear fusion reactor but figured out how to put it on the Moon?

Not likely. I mention Helium-3 only as an interesting curiosity, as did you.
A compact nuclear power plant, like the ones used on submarines, would be a good backup power supply.
 

1. What is the potential for solar energy on the moon?

The moon receives an average of 1361 watts of solar energy per square meter, which is about 60% of the solar energy received on Earth. This makes solar energy a viable option for powering a lunar base.

2. Can nuclear energy be used on the moon?

Yes, nuclear energy can be used on the moon. However, it would require a complex and expensive infrastructure to transport and maintain a nuclear reactor on the moon.

3. What about geothermal energy on the moon?

Geothermal energy is not a viable option on the moon as there is no significant source of heat within the moon's interior to harness.

4. Are there any other potential energy sources on the moon?

Other potential energy sources on the moon include wind and hydro power. However, these sources are not as reliable as solar energy due to the moon's thin atmosphere and lack of significant bodies of water.

5. How efficient is the conversion of energy on the moon?

The efficiency of energy conversion on the moon depends on the specific energy source and technology used. Solar energy has the potential to be very efficient on the moon, while other sources such as nuclear energy may have lower efficiency rates due to the extreme conditions on the moon.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
44
Views
10K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top