Possible energy sources that a lunar base might have as an option

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on potential energy sources for a lunar base, projecting advancements over the next fifty years. Key options identified include solar power, nuclear fission, and radionuclide energy, with solar being favored due to its simplicity and reliability in the Moon's environment. While fusion energy, particularly using helium-3, is noted as a future possibility, significant technological hurdles remain. A combination of solar and compact nuclear power is proposed as the most viable solution for sustaining a lunar base.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar energy systems
  • Knowledge of nuclear fission and fusion technologies
  • Familiarity with radionuclide power sources
  • Awareness of lunar environmental conditions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in solar panel technology for extraterrestrial applications
  • Explore the development of compact nuclear reactors for space use
  • Investigate the feasibility of helium-3 as a fusion fuel source
  • Study the implications of radionuclide decay in power generation
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, energy researchers, and anyone involved in the planning and development of lunar habitats and energy systems.

MonserrateM
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So I am doing research for the different energy sources that might be available for a space base in about fifty years from now. Some of these energy sources would likely be solar, fusion, fission, Nuclear, and I heard of radio - nuclide as well.

What else could be used? In addition, does anyone know much about radio - nuclide power?

In addition, suppose that this base was managed by robots, what kind of energy sources could we possibly use to power these robots?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If we are talking about the Moon then solar would be your best bet. No atmosphere to disturb it. In 50 years time we might see commercial fusion reactors on the Earth but I doubt we will be able to put them on the Moon (barring big breakthroughs they'll be running D/T as a fuel source as well so lunar He3 doesn't change anything), there are also unique difficulties for fusion in space e.g how to handle waste heat. Nuclear is a possibility if you can build a small, simple nuclear reactor and sending up the nuclear engineers to maintain it isn't an issue for you.

Personally I would say that solar; being an energy harvester all you have to do is build it and off you go. Anything else is going to have to include a supply chain of fuel and would require more people to run it. Plus there's always a risk with things like fusion and fission that they will break and at best you've now got to ship up a new reactor. There's little that would damage solar panels once they were laid down on the Moon.

(Of course the unspoken caveat here is that this lunar base project already has all the necessary funding and technology to do it)
 
Radionuclide refers to atoms which undergo radioactive decay.
For example, the fuel for nuclear (fission) power plants are radionuclides.

My opinion is that a combination of solar and nuclear power is ideal for a Moon base.

Fusion is interesting because the Moon may be rich in helium-3, a potentially useful fuel.
 
gendou2 said:
Radionuclide refers to atoms which undergo radioactive decay.
For example, the fuel for nuclear (fission) power plants are radionuclides.

My opinion is that a combination of solar and nuclear power is ideal for a Moon base.

Fusion is interesting because the Moon may be rich in helium-3, a potentially useful fuel.

The OP is talking about 50 years from now. Do you think that by that time we will not only have developed a second generation nuclear fusion reactor but figured out how to put it on the Moon?
 
Ryan_m_b said:
The OP is talking about 50 years from now. Do you think that by that time we will not only have developed a second generation nuclear fusion reactor but figured out how to put it on the Moon?

Not likely. I mention Helium-3 only as an interesting curiosity, as did you.
A compact nuclear power plant, like the ones used on submarines, would be a good backup power supply.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K